ElectricFlow Plugin up to 1.1.5 on Jenkins cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in ElectricFlow Plugin up to 1.1.5 on Jenkins. This affects an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2019-10331. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Details
A vulnerability was found in ElectricFlow Plugin up to 1.1.5 on Jenkins (Jenkins Plugin). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins ElectricFlow Plugin 1.1.5 and earlier in Configuration#doTestConnection allowed attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials.
The weakness was published 06/11/2019 (oss-sec). It is possible to read the advisory at openwall.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2019-10331 since 03/29/2019. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Similar entries are available at VDB-136376, VDB-136377, VDB-136378 and VDB-136379. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 4.3
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/29/2019 🔍06/11/2019 🔍
06/12/2019 🔍
10/03/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: openwall.comStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2019-10331 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-10331
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-136375
SecurityFocus: 108747
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/12/2019 11:07 AMUpdated: 10/03/2023 03:35 PM
Changes: 06/12/2019 11:07 AM (55), 06/22/2020 04:58 PM (1), 10/03/2023 03:35 PM (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 244:C4E:40
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.