Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in IntraSrv 1.0. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2019-17181. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in IntraSrv 1.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a buffer overflow vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-120. The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

A remote SEH buffer overflow has been discovered in IntraSrv 1.0 (2007-06-03). An attacker may send a crafted HTTP GET or HEAD request that can result in a compromise of the hosting system.

The weakness was disclosed 10/28/2019. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2019-17181 since 10/04/2019. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Name

• IntraSrv

Version

• 1.0

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

Submitinfo

Duplicate

• Submit #XXXXXX: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx X.x Xxxxxx Xx Xxxxxxx (by fernando.mengali)

Discussion