TRENDnet TEW-651BR/TEW-652BRP/TEW-652BRU get_set.ccp lanHostCfg_HostName_11100 os command injection
CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
---|---|---|
8.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in TRENDnet TEW-651BR, TEW-652BRP and TEW-652BRU (version now known). This issue affects some unknown processing of the file get_set.ccp. The manipulation of the argument lanHostCfg_HostName_11100
as part of a Parameter leads to a os command injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered on TRENDnet TEW-651BR 2.04B1, TEW-652BRP 3.04b01, and TEW-652BRU 1.00b12 devices. OS command injection occurs through the get_set.ccp lanHostCfg_HostName_1.1.1.0.0 parameter.
The weakness was disclosed 12/18/2019. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2019-11399 since 04/21/2019. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entry 147378 is pretty similar.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB CVSS-B Score: 🔍VulDB CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
ATT&CK: T1202
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
0-Day | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
---|---|---|---|---|
Today | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/21/2019 🔍12/18/2019 🔍
12/19/2019 🔍
03/15/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-11399 (🔍)
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 12/19/2019 08:48Updated: 03/15/2024 06:51
Changes: 12/19/2019 08:48 (37), 12/19/2019 08:53 (17), 03/15/2024 06:51 (3)
Complete: 🔍
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.