tobias_.MerZ Browser Caching with .htaccess Plugin 1.2.1 on WordPress cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in tobias_.MerZ Browser Caching with .htaccess Plugin 1.2.1 on WordPress. Impacted is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-31439. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Details
A vulnerability was found in tobias_.MerZ Browser Caching with .htaccess Plugin 1.2.1 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in tobias_.MerZ Browser Caching with .htaccess allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Browser Caching with .htaccess: from 1.2.1 through n/a.
The weakness was released by Nguyen Xuan Chien. It is possible to read the advisory at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-31439 since 03/28/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.4
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
03/28/2025 Advisory disclosed03/28/2025 CVE reserved
03/28/2025 VulDB entry created
03/28/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Nguyen Xuan Chien
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-31439 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-31439
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-301911
Entry
Created: 03/28/2025 01:42 PMChanges: 03/28/2025 01:42 PM (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 244:185:40
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.