Alhem C++ Sockets Library up to 2.2.3 httpsocket.cpp input validation

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.6$0-$5k0.00

A vulnerability has been found in Alhem C++ Sockets Library up to 2.2.3 (Software Library) and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the file httpsocket.cpp. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:

HTTPSocket.cpp in the C++ Sockets Library before 2.2.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an HTTP request with a missing protocol version number, which triggers an exception. NOTE: some of these details were obtained from third party information.

The weakness was presented 11/07/2007 (Website). The advisory is shared at secunia.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2007-5893 since 11/07/2007. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.

Upgrading to version 2.2.4 eliminates this vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at X-Force (38309).

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB CVSS-B Score: 🔍
VulDB CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.6

VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Input validation
CWE: CWE-20
ATT&CK: Unknown

Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-Dayunlockunlockunlockunlock
Todayunlockunlockunlockunlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍
Upgrade: C++ Sockets Library 2.2.4

Timelineinfo

11/05/2007 🔍
11/07/2007 +2 days 🔍
11/07/2007 +0 days 🔍
11/07/2007 +0 days 🔍
11/07/2007 +0 days 🔍
03/16/2015 +2685 days 🔍
11/01/2017 +961 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: secunia.com
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2007-5893 (🔍)
X-Force: 38309 - C++ Sockets Library HTTPSocket.cpp denial of service
SecurityFocus: 26361 - C++ Sockets Library HTTPSocket Class Remote Denial Of Service Vulnerability
Secunia: 27535
OSVDB: 42105 - C++ Sockets Library HTTPSocket.cpp Malformed HTTP Request Remote DoS

Entryinfo

Created: 03/16/2015 12:18
Updated: 11/01/2017 10:43
Changes: 03/16/2015 12:18 (55), 11/01/2017 10:43 (6)
Complete: 🔍

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!