CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
---|---|---|
9.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in ElectraSoft 32bit FTP 09.04.24. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability was named CVE-2009-1611. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Details
A vulnerability classified as very critical has been found in ElectraSoft 32bit FTP 09.04.24. This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Stack-based buffer overflow in ElectraSoft 32bit FTP 09.04.24 allows remote FTP servers to execute arbitrary code via a long 257 reply to a CWD command.
The weakness was presented 05/11/2009 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at vupen.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2009-1611 since 05/11/2009. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/28/2024).
A public exploit has been developed in Python. The exploit is shared for download at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (8613) and SecurityFocus (BID 34838†). See VDB-48231 for similar entry. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.1
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 9.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
0-Day | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
---|---|---|---|---|
Today | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
OpenVAS ID: 800569
OpenVAS Name: ElectraSoft 32bit FTP Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/05/2009 🔍05/11/2009 🔍
05/11/2009 🔍
05/11/2009 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
11/28/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: vupen.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2009-1611 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2009-1611
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-48123
SecurityFocus: 34838 - 32bit FTP 'CWD' Response Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Vupen: ADV-2009-1263
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 11:38 PMUpdated: 11/28/2024 10:12 PM
Changes: 03/17/2015 11:38 PM (58), 12/14/2017 09:55 AM (2), 11/28/2024 10:12 PM (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 18:2F3:40
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.