Richard Ellerbrock IPplan 4.91a cross-site request forgery

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.9$0-$5k0.00

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Richard Ellerbrock IPplan 4.91a. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IPplan 4.91a allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the password, (2) add users, or (3) delete users via unknown vectors.

The weakness was presented 05/20/2009 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at osvdb.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2009-1733 since 05/20/2009. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.

It is declared as highly functional.

It is possible to mitigate the problem by adding an authentication mechanism. A possible mitigation has been published 3 months after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at X-Force (50632). See 48242 for similar entry.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB CVSS-B Score: 🔍
VulDB CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cross-site request forgery
CWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
ATT&CK: Unknown

Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-Dayunlockunlockunlockunlock
Todayunlockunlockunlockunlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Authentication
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

05/20/2009 🔍
05/20/2009 +0 days 🔍
05/20/2009 +0 days 🔍
05/20/2009 +0 days 🔍
07/21/2009 +61 days 🔍
03/17/2015 +2065 days 🔍
11/09/2018 +1333 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: osvdb.org
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2009-1733 (🔍)
X-Force: 50632 - IPplan unspecified cross-site request forgery
Secunia: 34985
OSVDB: 54601 - IPplan Multiple Unspecified CSRF

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/17/2015 23:38
Updated: 11/09/2018 09:17
Changes: 03/17/2015 23:38 (54), 11/09/2018 09:17 (3)
Complete: 🔍

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!