Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch up to 9.x input validation

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
7.2$0-$5k0.00

A vulnerability was found in Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch up to 9.x. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:

The SIP implementation on the Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch with software before 9.7(3)S10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via a malformed session attribute, aka Bug ID CSCsk40030.

The weakness was published 05/14/2010 with Cisco (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at cisco.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-0603. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.

Upgrading to version 9.7%283%29s9 eliminates this vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at X-Force (58509). Similar entries are available at 53223, 53222, 53221 and 53220.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Support

  • end of life (old version)

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB CVSS-B Score: 🔍
VulDB CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2

VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Input validation
CWE: CWE-20
ATT&CK: Unknown

Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-Dayunlockunlockunlockunlock
Todayunlockunlockunlockunlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: PGW 2200 Softswitch 9.7%283%29s9

Timelineinfo

02/10/2010 🔍
05/12/2010 +91 days 🔍
05/12/2010 +0 days 🔍
05/14/2010 +2 days 🔍
05/14/2010 +0 days 🔍
05/17/2010 +3 days 🔍
03/19/2015 +1767 days 🔍
09/13/2021 +2370 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: cisco.com

Advisory: cisco.com
Organization: Cisco
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2010-0603 (🔍)
X-Force: 58509
Vulnerability Center: 25753 - [cisco-sa-20100512-pgw]Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch DoS Vulnerability via a Malformed Session Attribute, High
SecurityFocus: 40121 - Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch Session Attribute Denial of Service Vulnerability

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/19/2015 12:22
Updated: 09/13/2021 15:02
Changes: 03/19/2015 12:22 (50), 02/24/2017 11:06 (9), 09/13/2021 15:02 (3)
Complete: 🔍

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!