Mono-project libgdiplus 2.6.7 tiffcodec.c gdip_read_bmp_image numeric error
CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
---|---|---|
7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Mono-project libgdiplus 2.6.7 (Project Management Software). This affects the function gdip_read_bmp_image
of the file tiffcodec.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a numeric error vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-189. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple integer overflows in libgdiplus 2.6.7, as used in Mono, allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted TIFF file, related to the gdip_load_tiff_image function in tiffcodec.c; (2) a crafted JPEG file, related to the gdip_load_jpeg_image_internal function in jpegcodec.c; or (3) a crafted BMP file, related to the gdip_read_bmp_image function in bmpcodec.c, leading to heap-based buffer overflows.
The weakness was disclosed 08/24/2010 (Website). The advisory is shared at secunia.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2010-1526 since 04/26/2010. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 71801 (GLSA-201401-01 : Libgdiplus: Arbitrary code execution), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Gentoo Local Security Checks. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 165197 (SUSE Security Update for Multiple Packages (SUSE-SR:2010:018)).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (71801). The entries 53117, 53115, 53113 and 54662 are pretty similar.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB CVSS-B Score: 🔍VulDB CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Numeric errorCWE: CWE-189
ATT&CK: Unknown
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
0-Day | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
---|---|---|---|---|
Today | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
Nessus ID: 71801
Nessus Name: GLSA-201401-01 : Libgdiplus: Arbitrary code execution
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 862611
OpenVAS Name: Fedora Update for libgdiplus FEDORA-2010-13676
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/26/2010 🔍08/23/2010 🔍
08/24/2010 🔍
08/24/2010 🔍
08/24/2010 🔍
09/07/2010 🔍
01/06/2014 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
09/23/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: secunia.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2010-1526 (🔍)
OVAL: 🔍
Vulnerability Center: 27051 - libgdiplus 2.6.7 Multiple Integer Overflows Allow Remote Code Execution via a Crafted File, Medium
SecurityFocus: 42602
Secunia: 40792 - Mono libgdiplus Image Processing Integer Overflow Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 14:37Updated: 09/23/2021 21:51
Changes: 03/19/2015 14:37 (62), 03/04/2017 14:44 (10), 09/23/2021 21:51 (4)
Complete: 🔍
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.