CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
---|---|---|
6.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
A vulnerability was found in Uninett radsecproxy up to 1.6 (Firewall Software). It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown code of the component Access Restriction. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-264. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, and integrity. The summary by CVE is:
radsecproxy before 1.6.1 does not properly verify certificates when there are configuration blocks with CA settings that are unrelated to the block being used for verifying the certificate chain, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof clients.
The weakness was disclosed 11/19/2012 (Website). The advisory is shared at project.nordu.net. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2012-4523 since 08/21/2012. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 62872 (Debian DSA-2573-1 : radsecproxy - SSL certificate verification weakness), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Debian Local Security Checks.
Upgrading to version 1.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (79401), Tenable (62872), SecurityFocus (BID 56105†), Secunia (SA51251†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-37336†). The entry VDB-62999 is pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-264
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
0-Day | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
---|---|---|---|---|
Today | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
Nessus ID: 62872
Nessus Name: Debian DSA-2573-1 : radsecproxy - SSL certificate verification weakness
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 72568
OpenVAS Name: Debian Security Advisory DSA 2573-1 (radsecproxy)
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: radsecproxy 1.0
Timeline
08/21/2012 🔍09/13/2012 🔍
10/18/2012 🔍
11/12/2012 🔍
11/19/2012 🔍
11/19/2012 🔍
11/20/2012 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
12/20/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: DSA-2573Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2012-4523 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-4523
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-62997
OVAL: 🔍
X-Force: 79401
SecurityFocus: 56105 - radsecproxy Client Certificate Verification Security Bypass Vulnerability
Secunia: 51251
Vulnerability Center: 37336 - Radsecproxy Before 1.6.1 Remote Security Bypass Vulnerability, Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22 PMUpdated: 12/20/2021 09:08 AM
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 PM (68), 04/21/2017 01:23 PM (6), 12/20/2021 09:00 AM (3), 12/20/2021 09:04 AM (1), 12/20/2021 09:08 AM (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 18:EC1:40
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.