Supermicro H8dgu-f Intelligent Platform Management Interface PrivilegeCallBack input validation
CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
---|---|---|
9.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
A vulnerability classified as very critical was found in Supermicro H8dgu-f (the affected version is unknown). Affected by this vulnerability is the function PrivilegeCallBack
of the component Intelligent Platform Management Interface. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The web interface in the Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI) implementation on Supermicro H8DC*, H8DG*, H8SCM-F, H8SGL-F, H8SM*, X7SP*, X8DT*, X8SI*, X9DAX-*, X9DB*, X9DR*, X9QR*, X9SBAA-F, X9SC*, X9SPU-F, and X9SR* devices relies on JavaScript code on the client for authorization checks, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted request, related to the PrivilegeCallBack function.
The weakness was presented 09/07/2013 by Alex as confirmed advisory (CERT.org). The advisory is shared at kb.cert.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2013-3609 since 05/21/2013. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 12/22/2024).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 62098†). See VDB-65714, VDB-64872 and VDB-64871 for similar entries. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
0-Day | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
---|---|---|---|---|
Today | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/21/2013 🔍08/30/2013 🔍
09/07/2013 🔍
09/07/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
12/22/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: kb.cert.orgResearcher: Alex
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-3609 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-3609
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-64873
CERT: 🔍
SecurityFocus: 62098 - Supermicro IPMI Web Interface Unspecified Remote Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 03:54 PMUpdated: 12/22/2024 05:48 AM
Changes: 03/24/2015 03:54 PM (50), 03/16/2019 05:22 PM (4), 12/22/2024 05:48 AM (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 18:116:40
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.