McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention 9.2.0 cross-site request forgery

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.1$0-$5k0.00

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention 9.2.0 (Data Loss Prevention Software). Affected is an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. CVE summarizes:

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention (NDLP) before 9.3 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.

The weakness was released 10/03/2014 as SB10053 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared for download at kc.mcafee.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2014-8521 since 10/29/2014. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. Technical details are unknown but an exploit is available.

It is declared as highly functional.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at X-Force (99779). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at 2600, 9959, 9960 and 9961.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB CVSS-B Score: 🔍
VulDB CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cross-site request forgery
CWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
ATT&CK: Unknown

Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-Dayunlockunlockunlockunlock
Todayunlockunlockunlockunlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

10/03/2014 🔍
10/03/2014 +0 days 🔍
10/29/2014 +26 days 🔍
10/29/2014 +0 days 🔍
01/13/2015 +76 days 🔍
07/09/2017 +908 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: mcafee.com

Advisory: SB10053
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2014-8521 (🔍)
X-Force: 99779 - McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention cross-site scripting, Medium Risk
SecurityFocus: 70820 - McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention CVE-2014-8521 Unspecified Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 01/13/2015 14:16
Updated: 07/09/2017 08:12
Changes: 01/13/2015 14:16 (51), 07/09/2017 08:12 (8)
Complete: 🔍

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!