bbs100 v*printf memory corruption

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.9$0-$5k0.00

A vulnerability was found in bbs100 (affected version unknown). It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function v*printf. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect availability. CVE summarizes:

Buffer overflow in bbs100 before 3.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by attempting to login as the Guest user when another Guest user is already logged in, possibly related to the state_login_prompt function in state_login.c.

The weakness was disclosed 06/22/2007 (Website). The advisory is shared for download at ka.sara.nl. This vulnerability was named CVE-2007-3551 since 07/03/2007. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are required for exploitation. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at X-Force (35242). The entries 37629 and 37628 are pretty similar.

Productinfo

Name

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB CVSS-B Score: 🔍
VulDB CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.9
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.9

VulDB Base Score: 4.9
VulDB Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Memory corruption
CWE: CWE-119
ATT&CK: Unknown

Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-Dayunlockunlockunlockunlock
Todayunlockunlockunlockunlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

06/22/2007 🔍
07/03/2007 +10 days 🔍
07/03/2007 +0 days 🔍
07/03/2007 +0 days 🔍
07/03/2007 +0 days 🔍
07/03/2007 +0 days 🔍
05/08/2016 +3231 days 🔍
01/04/2019 +971 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: ka.sara.nl
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2007-3551 (🔍)
X-Force: 35242
SecurityFocus: 24747 - BBS100 Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 25924 - bbs100 Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 37807 - bbs100 on Debian PPC v*printf() DoS

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 05/08/2016 22:08
Updated: 01/04/2019 12:51
Changes: 05/08/2016 22:08 (53), 01/04/2019 12:51 (5)
Complete: 🔍

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!