VDB-92425 · CVE-2016-0913 · BID 93348

EMC Replication Manager up to 5.5.3.0 Client input validation

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
9.6$0-$5k0.00

A vulnerability has been found in EMC Replication Manager up to 5.5.3.0 and classified as very critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the component Client. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

The client in EMC Replication Manager (RM) before 5.5.3.0_01-PatchHotfix, EMC Network Module for Microsoft 3.x, and EMC Networker Module for Microsoft 8.2.x before 8.2.3.6 allows remote RM servers to execute arbitrary commands by placing a crafted script in an SMB share.

The weakness was published 10/05/2016 by Felix Wilhelm with ERNW (Website). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2016-0913 since 12/17/2015. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/22/2022).

Applying the patch 5.5.3.0_01-PatchHotfix is able to eliminate this problem.

Similar entry is available at 92422.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB CVSS-B Score: 🔍
VulDB CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.6

VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Input validation
CWE: CWE-20
ATT&CK: Unknown

Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-Dayunlockunlockunlockunlock
Todayunlockunlockunlockunlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Patch
Status: 🔍
Patch: 5.5.3.0_01-PatchHotfix

Timelineinfo

12/17/2015 🔍
10/04/2016 +292 days 🔍
10/04/2016 +0 days 🔍
10/05/2016 +1 days 🔍
10/05/2016 +0 days 🔍
09/22/2022 +2178 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: dellemc.com

Advisory: seclists.org
Researcher: Felix Wilhelm
Organization: ERNW
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2016-0913 (🔍)
SecurityTracker: 1036940
SecurityFocus: 93348 - Multiple EMC Products CVE-2016-0913 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 10/05/2016 11:38
Updated: 09/22/2022 11:44
Changes: 10/05/2016 11:38 (51), 05/02/2019 09:27 (13), 09/22/2022 11:44 (3)
Complete: 🔍

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!