Cybozu Office up to 10.4.0 resource management

entryeditHistoryDiffjsonxmlCTI
CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.4$0-$5k0.00

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Cybozu Office up to 10.4.0 (Office Suite Software). This affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-399. This is going to have an impact on availability.

The bug was discovered 10/03/2016. The weakness was released 04/17/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at jvn.jp. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2016-4871 since 05/17/2016. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. A authentication is necessary for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 196 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 97716). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at 99924, 99923, 99922 and 99920.

Productinfoedit

Type

Name

CPE 2.3infoedit

CPE 2.2infoedit

CVSSv3infoedit

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2infoedit

AVACAuCIA
🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍
🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍
🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock
unlockunlockunlockunlockunlockunlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfoedit

Class: Denial of service
CWE: CWE-399
ATT&CK: Unknown

Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-Dayunlockunlockunlockunlock
Todayunlockunlockunlockunlock

OpenVAS ID: 801056
OpenVAS Name: Cybozu Office CVE-2016-4871 Denial of Service Vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfoedit

Threat: 🔍
Adversaries: 🔍
Geopolitics: 🔍
Economy: 🔍
Predictions: 🔍
Remediation: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfoedit

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfoedit

05/17/2016 🔍
10/03/2016 +139 days 🔍
04/17/2017 +196 days 🔍
04/17/2017 +0 days 🔍
04/17/2017 +0 days 🔍
04/18/2017 +1 days 🔍
08/31/2020 +1231 days 🔍

Sourcesinfoedit

Advisory: jvn.jp
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2016-4871 (🔍)
SecurityFocus: 97716 - Cybozu Office CVE-2016-4871 Denial of Service Vulnerability
OSVDB: - CVE-2016-4871 - Cybozu - Office - Denial of Service Issue

See also: 🔍

Entryinfoedit

Created: 04/18/2017 10:31 AM
Updated: 08/31/2020 04:33 PM
Changes: (4) vulnerability_discoverydate source_osvdb_title source_securityfocus_date source_securityfocus_class
Complete: 🔍

Comments

No comments yet. Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!