Gitlab Vulnerabilities

Timeline

The analysis of the timeline helps to identify the required approach and handling of single vulnerabilities and vulnerability collections. This overview makes it possible to see less important slices and more severe hotspots at a glance. Initiating immediate vulnerability response and prioritizing of issues is possible.

Last Year

The analysis of the timeline helps to identify the required approach and handling of single vulnerabilities and vulnerability collections. This overview makes it possible to see less important slices and more severe hotspots at a glance. Initiating immediate vulnerability response and prioritizing of issues is possible.

Version

13.2.047
13.2.147
13.2.247
13.1.040
13.1.140

Grouping all affected versions of a specific product helps to determine existing issues. This makes it possible to determine vendors and products which need attention when it comes to remediations.

Remediation

Official Fix110
Temporary Fix0
Workaround0
Unavailable0
Not Defined53

Vendors and researchers are eager to find countermeasures to mitigate security vulnerabilities. These can be distinguished between multiple forms and levels of remediation which influence risks differently.

Exploitability

High1
Functional0
Proof-of-Concept2
Unproven0
Not Defined160

Researcher and attacker which are looking for security vulnerabilities try to exploit them for academic purposes or personal gain. The level and quality of exploitability can be distinguished to determine simplicity and strength of attacks.

Access Vector

Not Defined0
Physical0
Local3
Adjacent16
Network144

The approach a vulnerability it becomes important to use the expected access vector. This is typically via the network, local, or physically even.

Authentication

Not Defined0
High26
Low103
None34

To exploit a vulnerability a certail level of authentication might be required. Vulnerabilities without such a requirement are much more popular.

User Interaction

Not Defined0
Required47
None116

Some attack scenarios require some user interaction by a victim. This is typical for phishing, social engineering and cross site scripting attacks.

C3BM Index

Our unique C3BM Index (CVSSv3 Base Meta Index) cumulates the CVSSv3 Meta Base Scores of all entries over time. Comparing this index to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

Last Year

Our unique C3BM Index (CVSSv3 Base Meta Index) cumulates the CVSSv3 Meta Base Scores of all entries over time. Comparing this index to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

CVSSv3 Base

≤10
≤22
≤33
≤422
≤541
≤656
≤725
≤810
≤93
≤101

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) is an industry standard to define the characteristics and impacts of security vulnerabilities. The base score represents the intrinsic aspects that are constant over time and across user environments. Our unique meta score merges all available scores from different sources to aggregate to the most reliable result.

CVSSv3 Temp

≤10
≤22
≤35
≤424
≤545
≤653
≤726
≤84
≤93
≤101

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) uses temp scores to reflect the characteristics of a vulnerability that may change over time but not across user environments. This includes reporting confidence, exploitability and remediation levels. We do also provide our unique meta score for temp scores, even though other sources rarely publish them.

VulDB

≤10
≤25
≤39
≤428
≤564
≤618
≤726
≤812
≤90
≤101

The moderation team is always defining the base vector and base score for an entry. These and all other available scores are used to generate the meta score.

NVD

≤10
≤20
≤32
≤410
≤512
≤617
≤726
≤817
≤98
≤106

The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) is also defining CVSS vectors and scores. These are usually not complete and might differ from VulDB scores.

CNA

≤10
≤22
≤32
≤47
≤58
≤610
≤79
≤83
≤91
≤101

A CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) is responsible for assigning new CVE entries. They might also include a CVSS score. These are usually not complete and might differ from VulDB scores.

Vendor

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

Some vendors are willing to publish their own CVSS vectors and scores for vulnerabilities in their products. The coverage varies from vendor to vendor.

Research

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

There are sometimes also security researcher which provide their own CVSS vectors and scores for vulnerabilities they have found and published.

Exploit 0-day

<1k65
<2k51
<5k47
<10k0
<25k0
<50k0
<100k0
≥100k0

The moderation team is working with the threat intelligence team to determine prices for exploits. Our unique algorithm is used to identify the 0-day prices for an exploit, before it got distributed or became public. Calculated prices are aligned to prices disclosed by vulnerability broker and compared to prices we see on exploit markets.

Exploit Today

<1k154
<2k8
<5k1
<10k0
<25k0
<50k0
<100k0
≥100k0

The 0-day prices do not consider time-relevant factors. The today price does reflect price impacts like disclosure of vulnerability details, alternative exploits, availability of countermeasures. These dynamic aspects might decrease the exploit prices over time. Under certain circumstances this happens very fast.

Exploit Market Volume

Our unique calculation of exploit prices makes it possible to forecast the expected exploit market volume. The calculated prices for all possible 0-day expoits are cumulated for this task. Comparing the volume to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

Last Year

Our unique calculation of exploit prices makes it possible to forecast the expected exploit market volume. The calculated prices for all possible 0-day expoits are cumulated for this task. Comparing the volume to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

🔴 CTI Activities

Our unique Cyber Threat Intelligence aims to determine the ongoing research of actors to anticipiate their acitivities. Observing exploit markets on the Darknet, discussions of vulnerabilities on mailinglists, and exchanges on social media makes it possible to identify planned attacks. Monitored actors and activities are classified whether they are offensive or defensive. They are also weighted as some actors are well-known for certain products and technologies. And some of their disclosures might contain more or less details about technical aspects and personal context. The world map highlights active actors in real-time.

Affected Versions (365): 1.0, 1.0.4, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.5, 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.3, 1.5.4, 1.5.5, 1.5.6, 1.5.7, 1.5.8, 1.5.9, 1.5.11, 1.5.12, 1.5.13, 1.5.14, 1.5.15, 1.5.16, 1.5.17, 1.5.18, 1.5.19, 1.5.21, 1.5.22, 1.5.23, 1.5.24, 1.5.25, 1.5.26, 1.5.27, 1.5.28, 1.5.29, 1.5.31, 1.5.32, 1.5.33, 1.5.34, 1.5.35, 1.6, 1.7, 1.7.1, 1.7.2, 1.7.3, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11, 1.12, 1.13, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 2.11, 2.12, 2.13, 2.14, 2.15, 2.16, 2.17, 2.18, 2.19, 2.20, 2.21, 2.22, 2.23, 2.24, 2.25, 2.26, 2.27, 2.28, 3, 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14, 3.15, 5, 5.0.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 6, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.6, 6.6.1, 7.4, 7.4.1, 7.4.2, 7.12, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.9, 8.11.0-rc6, 8.14, 8.14.1, 8.14.2, 8.14.3, 8.14.4, 8.14.5, 8.14.6, 8.14.7, 8.14.8, 8.15, 8.15.1, 8.15.2, 8.15.3, 8.15.4, 8.15.5, 8.15.7, 8.16, 8.16.1, 8.16.2, 8.16.3, 8.16.4, 8.17.3, 9.1, 9.4, 9.4.1, 10.0, 10.1, 10.3, 10.3.1, 10.3.2, 10.3.3, 10.3.4, 10.3.5, 10.3.6, 10.3.7, 10.3.8, 10.4, 10.4.1, 10.4.2, 10.4.3, 10.4.4, 10.4.5, 10.5, 10.5.1, 10.5.2, 10.5.3, 10.5.4, 10.5.5, 10.8, 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, 11.6, 11.7, 11.8, 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 12.2.1, 12.2.2, 12.2.3, 12.3, 12.4, 12.5, 12.6, 12.6.1, 12.7, 12.7.1, 12.7.2, 12.8, 12.9, 12.10.1, 12.10.2, 12.10.3, 12.10.4, 12.10.5, 12.10.6, 12.10.7, 12.10.8, 12.10.9, 12.10.11, 12.10.12, 13, 13.0, 13.0.1, 13.0.2, 13.0.3, 13.0.4, 13.0.5, 13.0.6, 13.0.7, 13.0.8, 13.0.9, 13.0.11, 13.0.12, 13.0.13, 13.1, 13.1.1, 13.1.2, 13.1.3, 13.1.4, 13.1.5, 13.1.6, 13.1.7, 13.1.8, 13.1.9, 13.2, 13.2.1, 13.2.2, 13.2.3, 13.2.4, 13.2.5, 13.2.6, 13.2.7, 13.2.8, 13.2.9, 13.3, 13.3.1, 13.3.2, 13.3.3, 13.3.4, 13.3.5, 13.3.6, 13.4, 13.4.1, 13.5, 13.6, 13.7, 13.9, 13.9.1, 13.9.2, 13.9.3, 13.9.4, 13.9.5, 13.9.6, 13.9.7, 13.10, 13.10.1, 13.10.2, 13.10.3, 13.10.4, 13.11, 13.11.1, 13.11.2, 13.11.3, 13.11.4, 13.11.5, 13.12, 13.12.1, 13.12.2, 13.12.3, 13.12.4, 13.12.5, 14, 14.0, 14.0.1, 14.0.2, 14.0.3, 14.0.4, 14.0.5, 14.0.6, 14.0.7, 14.0.8, 14.1, 14.1.1, 14.1.2, 14.1.3, 14.2, 14.2.1, 14.2.2, 14.2.3, 14.2.4, 14.2.5, 14.3, 14.3.1, 14.3.2, 14.3.3, 14.4, 14.4.1, 14.4.2, 14.4.3, 14.4.4, 14.5, 14.5.1, 14.5.2, 14.5.3, 14.5.4, 14.6, 14.6.1, 14.6.2, 14.6.3, 14.6.4, 14.7, 14.7.1, 14.7.2, 14.7.3, 14.8, 14.8.1, 14.8.2, 14.8.3, 14.8.4, 14.8.5, 14.9, 14.9.1, 14.9.2, 14.9.3, 14.10, 14.10.1, 14.10.2, 14.10.3, 14.10.4, 15, 15.0, 15.0.1, 15.0.2, 15.0.3, 15.1, 15.1.1, 15.1.2, 15.1.3, 15.1.4, 15.1.5, 15.2, 15.2.1, 15.2.2, 15.2.3, 15.2.4, 15.3, 15.3.1, 15.3.2, 15.3.3, 15.4

Software Type: Bug Tracking Software

PublishedBaseTempVulnerability0dayTodayExpRemCTICVE
11/10/20225.35.2GitLab Healthcheck Endpoint denial of service$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.05CVE-2022-3285
10/29/20225.15.0GitLab unknown vulnerability$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2022-2826
10/20/20224.94.9GitLab Plugin Webhook Token timing discrepancy$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.00CVE-2022-43411
10/18/20225.95.7GitLab Issue access control$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2022-3066
10/17/20227.17.0GitLab Package Registry improper authentication$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2022-2533
07/29/20225.95.8GitLab Contact Details cross site scripting$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.06CVE-2022-1948
07/02/20223.73.7GitLab Autocomplete information disclosure$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2022-0167
07/02/20224.44.3GitLab Conan Package permission$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2022-2270
07/02/20228.78.6GitLab Project Import permission assignment$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2022-2185
07/01/20224.44.4GitLab Plugin Description cross site scripting$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.04CVE-2022-34777
05/18/20223.53.5GitLab Plugin HTTP Endpoint authorization$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.05CVE-2022-30955
05/12/20222.62.5GitLab Markdown Caching cross site scripting$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.09CVE-2022-1433
05/12/20225.25.1GitLab Scheduled Pipeline improper authorization$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2022-1460
05/12/20222.01.9GitLab Access Token improper authentication$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.09CVE-2022-1426
05/12/20225.45.3GitLab CI Editor/CI Pipeline Details Page resource consumption$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2022-1510
05/11/20224.34.2GitLab unknown vulnerability$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2022-1428
05/11/20224.34.2GitLab PyPi API Endpoint resource consumption$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2022-1431
04/26/20223.83.7GitLab Bulk Request denial of service$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2022-0477
03/29/20223.13.0GitLab Mirror information disclosure$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2022-0738
03/29/20223.13.0GitLab Private Project information disclosure$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2022-0344
03/29/20224.54.4GitLab Jira redirect$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2022-0283
03/29/20223.73.7GitLab server-side request forgery$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.03CVE-2022-0249
03/29/20225.95.9GitLab Project Import server-side request forgery$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.03CVE-2022-0136
03/29/20225.04.9GitLab CI Service certificate validation$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.08CVE-2022-0123
03/16/20223.53.5Gitlab Authentication Plugin config.xml credentials storage$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.09CVE-2022-27206

138 more entries are not shown

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!