Ibm Lotus Domino Vulnerabilities

Timeline

The analysis of the timeline helps to identify the required approach and handling of single vulnerabilities and vulnerability collections. This overview makes it possible to see less important slices and more severe hotspots at a glance. Initiating immediate vulnerability response and prioritizing of issues is possible.

Version

6.5.123
6.5.222
6.5.021
8.5.119
8.5.216

Grouping all affected versions of a specific product helps to determine existing issues. This makes it possible to determine vendors and products which need attention when it comes to remediations.

Remediation

Official Fix90
Temporary Fix0
Workaround7
Unavailable0
Not Defined26

Vendors and researchers are eager to find countermeasures to mitigate security vulnerabilities. These can be distinguished between multiple forms and levels of remediation which influence risks differently.

Exploitability

High10
Functional1
Proof-of-Concept47
Unproven3
Not Defined62

Researcher and attacker which are looking for security vulnerabilities try to exploit them for academic purposes or personal gain. The level and quality of exploitability can be distinguished to determine simplicity and strength of attacks.

Access Vector

Not Defined0
Physical0
Local15
Adjacent5
Network103

The approach a vulnerability it becomes important to use the expected access vector. This is typically via the network, local, or physically even.

Authentication

Not Defined0
High0
Low21
None102

To exploit a vulnerability a certail level of authentication might be required. Vulnerabilities without such a requirement are much more popular.

User Interaction

Not Defined0
Required21
None102

Some attack scenarios require some user interaction by a victim. This is typical for phishing, social engineering and cross site scripting attacks.

C3BM Index

Our unique C3BM Index (CVSSv3 Base Meta Index) cumulates the CVSSv3 Meta Base Scores of all entries over time. Comparing this index to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

CVSSv3 Base

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤410
≤514
≤631
≤715
≤832
≤93
≤1018

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) is an industry standard to define the characteristics and impacts of security vulnerabilities. The base score represents the intrinsic aspects that are constant over time and across user environments. Our unique meta score merges all available scores from different sources to aggregate to the most reliable result.

CVSSv3 Temp

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤414
≤514
≤635
≤728
≤811
≤99
≤1012

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) uses temp scores to reflect the characteristics of a vulnerability that may change over time but not across user environments. This includes reporting confidence, exploitability and remediation levels. We do also provide our unique meta score for temp scores, even though other sources rarely publish them.

VulDB

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤410
≤514
≤631
≤715
≤828
≤97
≤1018

The moderation team is always defining the base vector and base score for an entry. These and all other available scores are used to generate the meta score.

NVD

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤84
≤90
≤100

The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) is also defining CVSS vectors and scores. These are usually not complete and might differ from VulDB scores.

CNA

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

A CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) is responsible for assigning new CVE entries. They might also include a CVSS score. These are usually not complete and might differ from VulDB scores.

Vendor

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

Some vendors are willing to publish their own CVSS vectors and scores for vulnerabilities in their products. The coverage varies from vendor to vendor.

Research

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

There are sometimes also security researcher which provide their own CVSS vectors and scores for vulnerabilities they have found and published.

Exploit 0-day

<1k0
<2k1
<5k8
<10k39
<25k43
<50k32
<100k0
≥100k0

The moderation team is working with the threat intelligence team to determine prices for exploits. Our unique algorithm is used to identify the 0-day prices for an exploit, before it got distributed or became public. Calculated prices are aligned to prices disclosed by vulnerability broker and compared to prices we see on exploit markets.

Exploit Today

<1k104
<2k3
<5k12
<10k4
<25k0
<50k0
<100k0
≥100k0

The 0-day prices do not consider time-relevant factors. The today price does reflect price impacts like disclosure of vulnerability details, alternative exploits, availability of countermeasures. These dynamic aspects might decrease the exploit prices over time. Under certain circumstances this happens very fast.

Exploit Market Volume

Our unique calculation of exploit prices makes it possible to forecast the expected exploit market volume. The calculated prices for all possible 0-day expoits are cumulated for this task. Comparing the volume to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

🔴 CTI Activities

Our unique Cyber Threat Intelligence aims to determine the ongoing research of actors to anticipiate their acitivities. Observing exploit markets on the Darknet, discussions of vulnerabilities on mailinglists, and exchanges on social media makes it possible to identify planned attacks. Monitored actors and activities are classified whether they are offensive or defensive. They are also weighted as some actors are well-known for certain products and technologies. And some of their disclosures might contain more or less details about technical aspects and personal context. The world map highlights active actors in real-time.

Affected Versions (68): 4.6, 5, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 5.0.3, 5.0.4, 5.0.5, 5.0.6, 5.0.7, 5.0.8, 5.0.9, 5.0.9a, 5.0.12, 6, 6.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, 6.0.3, 6.0.4, 6.0.5, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.5.1, 6.5.2, 6.5.3, 6.5.4, 6.5.4 FP2, 6.5.5, 7, 7.0, 7.0.1, 7.0.1.1, 7.0.2, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.5.1, 8.5.1.5, 8.5.2, 8.5.2.4, 8.5.3, 8.5.3 FP6, 8.5.3.6, 8.5.4, 9.0, 9.0.1, 9.0.1 FP3, 9.0.1.5, R4.5 R6, R5, R5 5.0, R5.0.1, R5.0.2, R5.0.3, R5.0.4, R5.0.5, R5.0.6, R5.0.7, R5.0.8, R5.0.9, r5.0.7a

Link to Product Website: https://www.ibm.com/

Software Type: Groupware Software

PublishedBaseTempVulnerability0dayTodayExpRemCTICVE
06/07/20168.07.7IBM Lotus Domino Keyview PDF memory corruption$25k-$100k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2016-0301
06/07/20168.07.7IBM Lotus Domino Keyview PDF access control$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2016-0279
06/07/20168.07.7IBM Lotus Domino Keyview PDF access control$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2016-0278
06/07/20168.07.7IBM Lotus Domino Keyview PDF access control$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2016-0277
10/22/20157.37.0IBM Lotus Domino GIF Image memory corruption$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2015-5040
10/22/20157.37.0IBM Lotus Domino GIF Image memory corruption$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2015-4994
06/19/20153.53.4IBM Lotus Domino Web Server WebMail cross site scripting$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.05CVE-2015-1981
04/23/20145.35.1IBM Lotus Domino information disclosure$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2014-0892
03/26/20136.35.7IBM Lotus Domino cross site scripting$5k-$25k$0-$5kProof-of-ConceptOfficial Fix0.03
03/21/20134.34.1IBM Lotus Domino webadmin.nsf cross site scripting$5k-$25k$0-$5kHighOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2013-0488
03/21/20134.34.1IBM Lotus Domino webadmin.nsf cross-site request forgery$5k-$25k$0-$5kHighOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2013-0489
03/21/20137.56.5IBM Lotus Domino HTTP Server resource management$5k-$25k$0-$5kUnprovenOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2013-0486
03/21/20134.34.0IBM Lotus Domino Domino Java Console improper authentication$5k-$25k$0-$5kFunctionalOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2013-0487
02/27/20134.34.3IBM Lotus Domino cross site scripting$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.04CVE-2012-4844
02/27/20136.56.5IBM Lotus Domino resource management$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.04CVE-2012-4842
08/27/20125.35.0IBM Lotus Domino domcfg.nsf information disclosure$5k-$25k$0-$5kProof-of-ConceptNot Defined0.03
08/15/20128.88.4IBM Lotus Domino HTTP Server input validation$5k-$25k$0-$5kHighOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2012-3301
08/15/20128.88.4IBM Lotus Domino WebMail UI/Domino Help cross site scripting$5k-$25k$0-$5kHighOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2012-3302
12/21/20117.56.5IBM Lotus Domino RPC Authentication denial of service$5k-$25k$0-$5kUnprovenOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2011-1393
09/19/20114.34.3IBM Lotus Domino cross site scripting$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.00CVE-2011-3576
09/19/20119.99.4IBM Lotus Domino WebAdmin Nnotes.dll NSFComputeEvaluateExt memory corruption$25k-$100k$0-$5kProof-of-ConceptNot Defined0.04CVE-2011-3575
03/25/20118.48.4IBM Lotus Domino Default Configuration improper authentication$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.04CVE-2011-1520
03/25/201110.09.4IBM Lotus Domino Remote Console improper authentication$25k-$100k$0-$5kProof-of-ConceptNot Defined0.04CVE-2011-1519
02/08/201110.010.0IBM Lotus Domino Remote Console improper authentication$5k-$25k$0-$5kProof-of-ConceptNot Defined0.00CVE-2011-0920
02/08/201110.010.0IBM Lotus Domino IMAP Service memory corruption$25k-$100k$5k-$25kNot DefinedNot Defined0.03CVE-2011-0919

98 more entries are not shown

more entries by Ibm

Do you know our Splunk app?

Download it now for free!