CVE-2006-5175 in TeraStation HD-HTGL
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administrative interface for the TeraStation HD-HTGL firmware 2.05 beta 1 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify configurations or delete arbitrary data via unspecified vectors.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/02/2025
The CVE-2006-5175 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site request forgery flaw within the administrative interface of TeraStation HD-HTGL firmware versions 2.05 beta 1 and earlier. This vulnerability resides in the web-based management console that administrators use to configure and manage the network-attached storage device, creating a significant security risk for organizations relying on this hardware for data storage and network services. The flaw specifically affects the authentication and authorization mechanisms implemented in the firmware's web interface, which fails to properly validate the origin of requests originating from authenticated sessions. This weakness enables malicious actors to craft forged requests that appear to come from legitimate administrators, potentially compromising the integrity of the device's configuration and data storage capabilities.
The technical implementation of this CSRF vulnerability stems from the absence of proper anti-CSRF tokens or origin validation mechanisms within the administrative interface. When an authenticated user accesses the TeraStation's web management console, the system should verify that subsequent requests originate from the same trusted source and contain appropriate security tokens to prevent unauthorized modifications. However, the vulnerable firmware implementation does not enforce these protections, allowing remote attackers to exploit the gap through various attack vectors including social engineering campaigns, malicious websites, or compromised network infrastructure. The vulnerability operates at the application layer and specifically targets the web server component responsible for handling administrative requests, making it particularly dangerous as it bypasses traditional network-level security controls.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple configuration modifications to encompass potential data loss and system compromise. Attackers could leverage this flaw to delete arbitrary data stored on the device, modify critical system parameters that affect network connectivity or security settings, or even perform unauthorized administrative actions that could render the device unusable or compromise its security posture. The implications are particularly severe for organizations using TeraStation devices in enterprise environments where these storage systems may serve as primary repositories for sensitive business data or critical infrastructure components. The vulnerability's remote exploitation capability means that attackers do not require physical access to the device or network proximity, making it a particularly attractive target for cybercriminals seeking to compromise network storage systems without direct physical interaction.
Organizations affected by this vulnerability should immediately implement mitigations including firmware updates from the vendor, network segmentation to isolate affected devices, and the deployment of web application firewalls to detect and block suspicious requests. The vulnerability aligns with CWE-352, which specifically addresses cross-site request forgery flaws in web applications, and demonstrates the importance of implementing proper request validation and authentication mechanisms. From an ATT&CK framework perspective, this vulnerability maps to techniques involving privilege escalation and persistence through administrative interface manipulation, potentially enabling attackers to establish long-term access to network storage resources. The security community should also consider implementing additional monitoring controls to detect anomalous administrative activities that could indicate exploitation attempts, as the vulnerability's impact can be difficult to detect through traditional network monitoring alone due to its nature of appearing as legitimate administrative activity.