CVE-2018-4700
Summary
by MITRE
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-4300. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-4300. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-4300 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/23/2024
This CVE identifier represents a rejected candidate number that was superseded by CVE-2018-4300, indicating a duplicate entry in the CVE database system. The rejection process demonstrates the rigorous validation procedures employed by the MITRE Corporation and CVE Numbering Authorities to maintain database integrity and prevent confusion among security professionals. When a duplicate candidate is identified, the assigning authority removes all references and descriptions from the rejected candidate to ensure no accidental usage occurs in security advisories, vulnerability management systems, or threat intelligence feeds.
The duplicate candidate scenario reflects common challenges in vulnerability identification and cataloging where multiple organizations may independently discover and report the same security flaw. This particular case involves CVE-2018-4300, which represents a critical security vulnerability that required proper identification and tracking within the CVE system. The rejection process ensures that security researchers, vendors, and organizations referencing the CVE database maintain consistency in their vulnerability management practices and avoid potential confusion during incident response activities.
Security professionals must understand that rejected CVE candidates like this one should never be used in production environments or security documentation. The removal of all references and descriptions from rejected candidates prevents potential misapplication of security patches or remediation efforts. This process aligns with industry best practices for maintaining the credibility and reliability of vulnerability databases, ensuring that each vulnerability receives a single, authoritative identifier that can be consistently referenced across security tools, databases, and communication channels.
The existence of rejected candidates within the CVE system demonstrates the dynamic nature of vulnerability management and the importance of proper validation procedures. Security teams should always verify that they are referencing the correct CVE identifier by checking the official MITRE CVE database or trusted authoritative sources. This practice prevents potential security gaps that could arise from using outdated or incorrect vulnerability identifiers, which could lead to ineffective patch management or compromised security postures in enterprise environments.