CVE-2000-0113 in Sygate
Summary
by MITRE
The SyGate Remote Management program does not properly restrict access to its administration service, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service, or access network traffic statistics.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/19/2025
The SyGate Remote Management program vulnerability represents a critical access control flaw that undermines the security posture of network infrastructure components. This issue stems from improper authorization mechanisms within the administration service, creating a pathway for unauthorized entities to exploit the system. The vulnerability affects systems where SyGate software is deployed as a remote management solution, typically used in enterprise environments for monitoring and controlling network traffic. The flaw allows attackers to bypass normal authentication procedures and gain access to administrative functions that should remain restricted to authorized personnel only. The specific nature of this vulnerability aligns with common security misconfigurations that occur when developers fail to implement proper access controls or when default settings leave critical services exposed to the network without adequate protection.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability manifests through the administration service's failure to enforce proper access restrictions, enabling remote attackers to interact with privileged functions without proper authentication. This allows for both denial of service conditions and unauthorized access to network traffic statistics, which can provide attackers with valuable information about network operations and potentially reveal sensitive operational details. The attack surface is particularly concerning because it affects core network management functionality that is essential for maintaining system integrity and monitoring network activity. The vulnerability's impact extends beyond simple unauthorized access, as the ability to cause denial of service can disrupt critical network operations and potentially create opportunities for more sophisticated attacks. This flaw typically operates at the application layer, exploiting weaknesses in how the software handles authentication requests and service access controls.
From an operational perspective, this vulnerability creates significant risks for organizations relying on SyGate for network management and monitoring. The exposure of network traffic statistics can provide attackers with detailed insights into network behavior, traffic patterns, and potentially sensitive data flows that could be exploited in subsequent attacks. The denial of service capability allows attackers to disrupt network management functions, potentially preventing legitimate administrators from accessing critical monitoring tools or making necessary configuration changes. The vulnerability's remote exploitation nature means that attackers can leverage this weakness from external networks without requiring physical access to the system. This characteristic significantly increases the attack surface and makes the vulnerability particularly dangerous in environments where network management systems are directly exposed to the internet. Organizations may experience operational disruptions, compliance violations, and potential data exposure incidents as a result of this vulnerability.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should focus on implementing proper access controls and network segmentation to limit exposure of administrative services. Organizations should ensure that the administration service is not directly accessible from untrusted networks and should implement strong authentication mechanisms including multi-factor authentication where possible. Network segmentation can help isolate critical management functions from general network traffic, reducing the attack surface for this type of vulnerability. Regular security assessments and vulnerability scanning should be conducted to identify similar access control weaknesses in other network management systems. The implementation of network access control lists and firewalls can help restrict access to administrative ports and services, while monitoring systems should be deployed to detect unauthorized access attempts. Organizations should also consider implementing intrusion detection systems that can identify patterns consistent with exploitation attempts against management services. Additionally, regular updates and patches should be applied to address known vulnerabilities in remote management software, and security configurations should be reviewed to ensure that default settings do not leave critical services exposed. This vulnerability demonstrates the importance of following security best practices for network management systems and the critical need for proper access control implementation in all network infrastructure components. The issue relates to common weakness categories identified in the CWE database including improper access control and insecure direct object references, and it aligns with attack patterns documented in the MITRE ATT&CK framework under initial access and privilege escalation techniques. Organizations should treat this vulnerability as part of a broader security assessment to identify and remediate similar access control weaknesses throughout their network infrastructure.