CVE-2001-1441 in Visualage for Java
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in VisualAge for Java 3.5 Professional allows remote attackers to execute JavaScript on other clients via the URL, which injects the script in the resulting error message.
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/17/2024
This vulnerability represents a classic cross-site scripting flaw that existed in IBM's VisualAge for Java 3.5 Professional development environment. The issue arises from insufficient input validation and output encoding mechanisms within the software's error handling system. When users navigate to malformed URLs or attempt to access non-existent resources within the development environment, the application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before incorporating it into error messages displayed to other users. This creates an opportunity for malicious actors to inject malicious javascript code through crafted URL parameters that are then reflected back to unsuspecting users who encounter the resulting error page.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability follows a standard XSS attack pattern where an attacker crafts a malicious URL containing javascript payload and directs a victim to access this crafted link. The VisualAge for Java application processes this URL without adequate sanitization, allowing the malicious script to be executed in the victim's browser context. This particular variant demonstrates a reflected XSS vulnerability classified under CWE-79 which specifically addresses improper neutralization of input during web page generation. The vulnerability is particularly dangerous because it operates within a development environment where users may have elevated privileges or access to sensitive code repositories and development resources.
From an operational impact perspective, this vulnerability poses significant risks to development teams using VisualAge for Java 3.5 Professional. Attackers could potentially steal session cookies, redirect users to malicious sites, or execute arbitrary code on development workstations. The vulnerability affects not just end users but also developers who might unknowingly execute malicious code when debugging applications or accessing error pages during development. This creates a potential attack vector that could compromise entire development environments and lead to code injection attacks against applications being developed. The threat model aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566 which covers spearphishing attacks and T1059 which covers command and scripting interpreter usage, as attackers could leverage this vulnerability to establish persistent access or escalate privileges within development environments.
The mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should focus on implementing proper input validation and output encoding mechanisms throughout the application's error handling pipeline. Developers should ensure that all user-supplied input is properly sanitized before being incorporated into error messages or any user-facing content. This includes implementing context-aware encoding for different output contexts such as HTML, JavaScript, and URL parameters. Organizations should also consider implementing content security policies to prevent unauthorized script execution, and regular security testing should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities in other components of the development environment. The fix would require updating the error handling code to properly escape or filter user input before rendering error messages, which aligns with security best practices established in OWASP Top 10 and NIST cybersecurity frameworks.