CVE-2004-1415 in 2bgal
Summary
by MITRE
SQL injection vulnerability in (1) disp_album.php and possibly (2) disp_img.php in 2Bgal 2.4 and 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id_album parameter.
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/02/2025
The CVE-2004-1415 vulnerability represents a critical SQL injection flaw affecting the 2Bgal web-based photo gallery application versions 2.4 and 2.5.1. This vulnerability specifically targets two key files within the application's codebase: disp_album.php and potentially disp_img.php. The flaw arises from insufficient input validation and sanitization of user-supplied data, particularly the id_album parameter that is processed through the web interface. The vulnerability falls under the Common Weakness Enumeration category CWE-89, which specifically identifies SQL injection weaknesses in software applications. Attackers exploiting this vulnerability can manipulate the application's database queries by injecting malicious SQL code through the vulnerable parameter, potentially gaining unauthorized access to sensitive data or executing arbitrary commands on the underlying database server.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability occurs when an attacker submits malicious input through the id_album parameter in the URL or form data. The application fails to properly sanitize or escape the input before incorporating it into SQL queries, allowing attackers to inject SQL syntax that alters the intended query execution flow. This manipulation can result in data extraction, modification, or deletion operations that the attacker did not intend to permit. The vulnerability is classified as a remote attack vector since no authentication is required to exploit it, making it particularly dangerous as it can be leveraged from any network location without prior access credentials. The attack surface expands due to the potential inclusion of disp_img.php as a secondary vulnerable file, indicating a broader codebase issue that may affect multiple application modules.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data theft, encompassing complete system compromise and potential denial of service conditions. Successful exploitation could enable attackers to extract sensitive information including user credentials, personal data, and application configuration details stored in the database. The vulnerability also poses risks of data integrity compromise where attackers might modify or delete critical application data, potentially rendering the photo gallery service unusable. According to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, this vulnerability maps to the T1190 technique for exploiting vulnerabilities in web applications, specifically targeting the persistence and privilege escalation capabilities through database manipulation. Organizations utilizing affected versions of 2Bgal face significant risk of unauthorized data access and potential system infiltration, particularly in environments where database credentials have elevated privileges.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2004-1415 must address both immediate remediation and long-term security hardening measures. The primary solution involves implementing proper input validation and parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection attacks, ensuring that all user-supplied data is properly escaped or sanitized before database processing. Organizations should upgrade to patched versions of 2Bgal or implement web application firewalls that can detect and block malicious SQL injection attempts. The vulnerability highlights the importance of secure coding practices and input validation as outlined in OWASP Top Ten security principles, particularly addressing the prevention of injection flaws. Additionally, implementing database access controls and privilege separation can limit the damage from successful exploitation attempts, ensuring that database accounts used by web applications have minimal necessary permissions. Regular security assessments and code reviews should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities in other application components, as this flaw demonstrates a pattern of insufficient input sanitization that may exist elsewhere in the codebase.