CVE-2004-2205 in Cluster Server
Summary
by MITRE
Unknown vulnerability in Veritas Cluster Server 1.0.1 through 4.0 allows local users to gain root access via unspecified vectors.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/29/2019
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2004-2205 represents a critical local privilege escalation flaw within Veritas Cluster Server versions 1.0.1 through 4.0. This issue stems from insufficient privilege separation mechanisms within the cluster management software, creating a pathway for local attackers to escalate their privileges to the root level. The vulnerability is particularly concerning as it affects multiple versions of the Veritas Cluster Server, indicating a widespread weakness in the software architecture that was not adequately addressed across the product line. The unspecified nature of the attack vectors suggests that the flaw may manifest through various mechanisms within the cluster server's operational environment, making it challenging to predict or fully enumerate all potential exploitation paths. Such vulnerabilities in cluster management systems are particularly dangerous as they can compromise the entire distributed computing environment that the cluster serves to manage.
The technical implementation of this privilege escalation vulnerability likely involves weaknesses in the software's access control mechanisms or improper handling of administrative privileges within the cluster server framework. The Veritas Cluster Server operates as a critical component for high availability and fault tolerance in enterprise environments, managing multiple nodes and services that require elevated privileges for proper operation. When local users can exploit this vulnerability, they effectively gain complete control over the cluster management functions, potentially allowing them to manipulate cluster configurations, disable failover mechanisms, or otherwise compromise the integrity and availability of the clustered services. This type of flaw falls under the category of local privilege escalation as defined by CWE-269, which specifically addresses issues where local attackers can gain elevated privileges within a system. The attack vector typically involves leveraging existing user accounts to execute malicious code or exploit weaknesses in privilege management within the cluster server's operational context.
The operational impact of CVE-2004-2205 extends far beyond simple privilege escalation, as it fundamentally undermines the security posture of any system running affected Veritas Cluster Server versions. In enterprise environments where cluster servers manage critical infrastructure components, this vulnerability could enable attackers to disrupt services, steal sensitive data, or create persistent backdoors within the network. The compromise of cluster management systems often leads to cascading security failures, as these systems typically control access to multiple networked resources and maintain configuration data for entire service ecosystems. Organizations relying on Veritas Cluster Server for high availability solutions face significant risk of service disruption or complete system compromise when this vulnerability is exploited. The implications are particularly severe given that cluster servers often operate in environments with high security requirements, where the compromise of a single node can affect the entire cluster's operational integrity. This vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK techniques related to privilege escalation and persistence, as it provides attackers with the foundation for maintaining long-term access to cluster environments.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2004-2205 should prioritize immediate patching of affected Veritas Cluster Server installations, as this represents the most effective defense against exploitation. Organizations should conduct comprehensive inventory assessments to identify all systems running vulnerable versions of the software and implement emergency patch deployment procedures. Access control measures should be strengthened through mandatory least privilege principles, ensuring that local user accounts have minimal necessary permissions within cluster environments. System administrators should implement comprehensive monitoring and logging of cluster management activities to detect potential exploitation attempts, particularly focusing on unusual privilege escalation events or unauthorized configuration changes. Network segmentation and host-based security controls should be enhanced to limit local access to cluster management systems, reducing the attack surface for local privilege escalation exploits. The vulnerability's classification as a local privilege escalation issue underscores the importance of maintaining strict physical and logical access controls, as this type of attack requires local system access to execute successfully. Regular security assessments and vulnerability scanning should be implemented to identify similar weaknesses in other enterprise systems that may present comparable risks. Organizations should also consider implementing security awareness training for system administrators to recognize potential signs of compromise in cluster management environments.