CVE-2005-2221 in Dragonfly Commerce
Summary
by MITRE
** DISPUTED ** Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Dragonfly Commerce allows remote attackers to modify SQL statements and possibly execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) key parameter to dc_Categoriesview.asp, (2) dc_productslist_Clearance.asp, (3) PID parameter to ratings.asp, (4) dc_Productsview.asp, (5) start, (6) key_mp, (7) searchtype, or (8) psearch parameters to dc_forum_Postslist.asp. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this issue, saying that the error messages arise from invalid category and product numbers. Assuming that this is the case, the issue still satisfies the CVE definition of "exposure."
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 08/08/2024
The vulnerability described in CVE-2005-2221 represents a critical SQL injection flaw within the Dragonfly Commerce platform that demonstrates the persistent challenges organizations face with input validation and database security. This issue affects multiple endpoints within the web application, creating a broad attack surface that could potentially allow malicious actors to manipulate database queries and execute unauthorized commands. The vulnerability's disputed status does not diminish its technical significance as it still represents a legitimate exposure that could be exploited under certain conditions, aligning with CVE definition criteria for security exposures.
Multiple attack vectors exist across different application modules, with the most significant being the key parameter in dc_Categoriesview.asp which allows attackers to inject malicious SQL code into the database query execution process. The dc_productslist_Clearance.asp endpoint presents another avenue for exploitation through similar injection techniques that could alter product listings and potentially access restricted data. The PID parameter in ratings.asp creates a direct pathway for attackers to manipulate rating systems and potentially extract sensitive information from underlying database structures.
The attack surface expands to include dc_Productsview.asp where the vulnerability could enable unauthorized access to product information and manipulation of product data. Additionally, the start, key_mp, searchtype, and psearch parameters in dc_forum_Postslist.asp provide further opportunities for attackers to compromise the forum functionality and potentially access user data or forum content. These multiple entry points demonstrate how poorly secured applications can create cascading vulnerabilities that affect various components of a single system.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability aligns with CWE-89, which specifically addresses SQL injection flaws where untrusted data is incorporated into SQL commands without proper sanitization or parameterization. The issue also connects to ATT&CK technique T1190, which describes the exploitation of vulnerabilities to gain access to systems and execute arbitrary commands. The vendor's disputed claim that error messages result from invalid category and product numbers does not negate the fundamental exposure, as the system still fails to properly validate and sanitize input parameters before incorporating them into database queries.
From an operational impact perspective, this vulnerability could enable attackers to extract sensitive customer data, manipulate product inventories, modify pricing information, and potentially gain administrative access to the system. The exposure creates opportunities for data breaches, financial fraud, and service disruption that could significantly impact business operations and customer trust. Organizations using Dragonfly Commerce would face potential regulatory compliance issues and liability concerns if such vulnerabilities are exploited.
The recommended mitigations include implementing proper input validation and parameterized queries throughout all affected endpoints, ensuring that user-supplied data is sanitized before database interaction. Organizations should implement web application firewalls to detect and block suspicious SQL injection patterns, and conduct comprehensive code reviews to identify similar vulnerabilities in other application components. Regular security testing and vulnerability assessments should be performed to identify and remediate similar exposure points. Additionally, implementing proper error handling that does not reveal database structure information to end users helps prevent information leakage that could aid attackers in exploiting these vulnerabilities.