CVE-2005-2560 in CFBB
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.cfm in CFBB 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the page parameter.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/10/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2005-2560 represents a classic cross-site scripting flaw within the CFBB 1.1.0 web application framework. This issue specifically affects the index.cfm script file which serves as a primary entry point for the application's functionality. The vulnerability arises from insufficient input validation and output sanitization mechanisms that fail to properly handle user-supplied data passed through the page parameter. Attackers can exploit this weakness by crafting malicious payloads that leverage the page parameter to inject arbitrary web scripts or HTML content into the application's response.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from the application's failure to sanitize or escape user input before incorporating it into dynamic web content. When the index.cfm script processes the page parameter, it directly incorporates the provided value into the generated HTML output without adequate security measures. This allows malicious actors to inject script tags, javascript code, or other HTML elements that execute within the context of other users' browsers. The vulnerability falls under CWE-79 which specifically addresses cross-site scripting flaws in web applications, where improper validation or sanitization of user-supplied data leads to code injection attacks.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data theft or defacement. An attacker who successfully exploits this XSS flaw can potentially hijack user sessions, redirect victims to malicious websites, or perform actions on behalf of authenticated users. The remote nature of the attack means that exploitation does not require physical access to the target system or network. Users who visit compromised pages may unknowingly execute malicious code, leading to potential data breaches, credential theft, or further exploitation of the affected application. The vulnerability affects all users of the CFBB 1.1.0 framework who interact with the index.cfm script, making it particularly dangerous in environments where multiple users access the application.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2005-2560 should focus on implementing proper input validation and output encoding mechanisms. The most effective approach involves sanitizing all user-supplied input through strict validation processes that reject or escape potentially dangerous characters and patterns. Organizations should implement content security policies that limit script execution within the application's context and ensure that the page parameter is properly escaped before being rendered in HTML output. Additionally, upgrading to a patched version of CFBB 1.1.0 or migrating to a more secure framework version represents the most comprehensive solution. Security practitioners should also consider implementing web application firewalls and runtime protection mechanisms that can detect and block suspicious script injection attempts. The vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of following secure coding practices and adhering to the principle of least privilege in web application development, where user input is always treated as potentially malicious and properly validated before processing.
This vulnerability aligns with several tactics outlined in the attack framework, particularly those involving initial access and execution phases. The attack vector represents a common technique used by threat actors to establish footholds within web applications, often serving as a precursor to more sophisticated attacks. Organizations should implement comprehensive security testing procedures including dynamic application security testing and manual code review to identify similar vulnerabilities within their web applications. The remediation process should also include security awareness training for developers to prevent similar issues in future application development cycles.