CVE-2005-4161 in MilliScripts
Summary
by MITRE
** DISPUTED ** Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in MilliScripts 1.4 redirect script allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the domainname parameter to register.php, and other unspecified vectors. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this issue, stating "No invalid input can reach the script."
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 08/17/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2005-4161 pertains to multiple cross-site scripting flaws discovered in MilliScripts 1.4 redirect script version. This security weakness specifically affects the register.php script where the domainname parameter serves as an injection vector for malicious web script or HTML content. The vulnerability classification aligns with CWE-79 which defines cross-site scripting as a code injection attack that enables attackers to execute scripts in the context of other users' browsers. The issue represents a classic client-side vulnerability that could potentially allow unauthorized execution of malicious code within the victim's browser environment.
The technical flaw manifests through improper input validation and output encoding mechanisms within the MilliScripts redirect functionality. When the domainname parameter is processed in register.php, the application fails to adequately sanitize or escape user-supplied data before incorporating it into dynamically generated web content. This lack of proper input sanitization creates an opportunity for attackers to inject malicious payloads that execute in the context of legitimate users visiting the affected web pages. The unspecified vectors mentioned in the description suggest that similar vulnerabilities may exist across other components of the script, though the specific locations remain undocumented.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple script execution as it enables attackers to perform various malicious activities including session hijacking, credential theft, and data exfiltration. When a victim's browser executes the injected malicious code, attackers can potentially access session cookies, steal sensitive information, or redirect users to malicious websites. This type of vulnerability undermines the fundamental security principle of input validation and demonstrates the critical importance of implementing proper output encoding mechanisms to prevent malicious content from being interpreted as executable code by web browsers. The vulnerability essentially allows attackers to manipulate the application's behavior and compromise user security.
While the vendor has disputed this issue by claiming "No invalid input can reach the script," this statement requires careful scrutiny as it contradicts the documented vulnerability conditions. According to industry standards and security best practices, all user-supplied input should be treated as potentially malicious and properly validated regardless of the application's internal defenses. The ATT&CK framework categorizes this vulnerability under T1059.007 which covers scripting languages and T1566.001 which involves malicious file execution through web applications. Organizations should not rely solely on vendor assertions but should implement their own security controls and validation measures. The disputed nature of this CVE highlights the importance of independent vulnerability assessment and the potential for vendor bias in security reporting. Mitigation strategies should include comprehensive input validation, output encoding, and regular security audits to identify and address potential XSS vulnerabilities in web applications regardless of vendor claims.