CVE-2006-1795 in At1 Event Publisher
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in tablepublisher.cgi in UPDI Network Enterprise @1 Table Publisher 2006-03-23 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Title of Table field.
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/05/2017
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2006-1795 represents a classic cross-site scripting flaw within the UPDI Network Enterprise @1 Table Publisher 2006-03-23 software. This issue specifically affects the tablepublisher.cgi component, which serves as a web interface for managing table content within the enterprise publishing platform. The vulnerability manifests when user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being rendered in web pages, creating an avenue for malicious actors to execute arbitrary scripts within the context of other users' browsers. The attack vector is particularly concerning as it targets the Title of Table field, a commonly used and editable parameter that users frequently interact with during content creation processes.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability follows the standard XSS attack pattern where malicious input is submitted through the vulnerable web form field and subsequently stored on the server. When other users view the affected table entries, their browsers execute the injected malicious code, which can range from simple HTML injection to more sophisticated script payloads. This type of vulnerability falls under CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation, which is a fundamental weakness in web application security. The vulnerability demonstrates poor input validation and output encoding practices, where the application fails to properly escape or sanitize user-provided data before incorporating it into dynamically generated web content. The specific implementation flaw allows attackers to inject script code that executes in the victim's browser context, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or redirection to malicious sites.
From an operational perspective, this vulnerability poses significant risks to enterprise environments where the UPDI Network Enterprise @1 Table Publisher is deployed. The impact extends beyond simple data corruption or display issues, as it can enable attackers to escalate privileges or access sensitive information within the application's context. The vulnerability is particularly dangerous in enterprise settings where multiple users interact with shared content management systems, as a single malicious entry can compromise all users who view the affected tables. Attackers can leverage this vulnerability to establish persistent access through session manipulation or to redirect users to phishing sites that harvest credentials. The attack requires minimal technical expertise, making it accessible to a wide range of threat actors, and the potential for widespread impact within an organization's web applications is substantial. This vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566.001 - Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment, as the malicious script injection can be used to deliver additional payloads or establish initial access points.
The recommended mitigation strategies for this vulnerability encompass multiple layers of defense to prevent exploitation. The primary remediation involves implementing proper input sanitization and output encoding mechanisms within the tablepublisher.cgi application, ensuring that all user-supplied data is properly escaped before being rendered in web contexts. This includes implementing strict validation of input fields, particularly the Title of Table parameter, and applying HTML escaping to prevent script execution. Organizations should also consider implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit script execution sources and prevent unauthorized code injection. The vulnerability highlights the critical importance of input validation and output encoding practices, which are fundamental requirements in secure software development. Additionally, regular security audits and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities in other components of the enterprise application stack, as this represents a common class of flaws that frequently appear in web applications. The remediation efforts should also include comprehensive staff training on secure coding practices and the implementation of automated security scanning tools to detect similar vulnerabilities in future development cycles.