CVE-2006-3667 in Financial Fusion Consumer Banking Solution
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in Sybase/Financial Fusion Consumer Banking Suite versions before 20060706 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/19/2017
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2006-3667 affects the Sybase/Financial Fusion Consumer Banking Suite, a critical financial application infrastructure used by banking institutions for core banking operations. This unspecified vulnerability represents a significant security gap within the financial services ecosystem, particularly concerning the protection of sensitive customer data and financial transactions. The affected versions prior to the 20060706 release indicate that this flaw existed for an extended period without proper remediation, creating potential exposure windows for malicious actors targeting financial institutions. The vulnerability's classification as having unknown impact and remote attack vectors suggests it could potentially allow unauthorized access to banking systems from external networks, making it particularly dangerous in the financial services sector where data integrity and confidentiality are paramount.
The technical nature of this vulnerability remains unspecified in the public record, but given that it affects a financial banking suite, it likely involves authentication mechanisms, data processing flows, or network communication protocols that could be exploited by remote attackers. The lack of specific technical details in the CVE description is concerning as it prevents security professionals from implementing targeted mitigations or assessing the exact risk exposure. According to CWE classification standards, this vulnerability could potentially map to several categories including CWE-1004 for insecure default configurations, CWE-20 for input validation issues, or CWE-284 for improper access control, though the exact mapping would require deeper analysis of the specific flaw. The vulnerability's presence in a consumer banking suite suggests it may involve user authentication, transaction processing, or data access controls that are fundamental to financial security operations.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data compromise, as it could enable attackers to manipulate financial transactions, access customer account information, or disrupt banking services. Financial institutions using the affected software would face potential regulatory compliance issues, as this vulnerability could violate data protection requirements under various financial regulations including PCI DSS, SOX, and banking-specific regulatory frameworks. The remote attack vector capability means that attackers could exploit this vulnerability from anywhere on the internet without requiring physical access to the banking infrastructure, significantly expanding the potential threat surface. Organizations operating this software would need to implement immediate security measures while awaiting official patches, potentially disrupting business operations during the remediation process.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should include immediate network segmentation to isolate the affected systems, implementation of additional authentication layers, and monitoring for suspicious network activity patterns. Security teams should also consider deploying intrusion detection systems specifically configured to detect exploitation attempts targeting the affected banking suite. The ATT&CK framework would classify this vulnerability under T1190 for Exploit Public-Facing Application, with potential T1071 for Application Layer Protocol usage and T1566 for Phishing as initial access vectors. Organizations should prioritize upgrading to the patched version released on or after July 6, 2006, while maintaining detailed logs of all system access and transaction activities for forensic analysis. Additionally, implementing network access controls and regular vulnerability assessments would help prevent similar issues in other financial applications within the organization's infrastructure.