CVE-2006-5994 in Word
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Word 2000 and 2002, Office Word and Word Viewer 2003, Word 2004 and 2004 v. X for Mac, and Works 2004, 2005, and 2006 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a Word document with a malformed string that triggers memory corruption, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-6456.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 01/17/2025
This vulnerability represents a critical memory corruption flaw affecting multiple Microsoft Office products including Word 2000, 2002, Word Viewer 2003, Word 2004 for Mac, and Works 2004 through 2006. The vulnerability manifests when processing malformed string data within Word documents, specifically targeting memory management routines that handle string parsing and manipulation. The flaw occurs during document parsing when the application encounters malformed string structures that cause improper memory allocation or access patterns, leading to potential code execution privileges for remote attackers. This vulnerability operates at the application layer and specifically targets the document processing engine's string handling capabilities, making it particularly dangerous given Word's widespread use for document exchange. The memory corruption aspect of this vulnerability aligns with common software security weaknesses identified in CWE-125, which describes out-of-bounds read conditions, and CWE-787, which covers out-of-bounds write operations. The attack vector is particularly concerning as it enables remote code execution through simple document delivery, requiring no user interaction beyond opening the malicious file. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2006-6456, indicating separate memory management flaws within the Office application suite. The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond individual system compromise to include potential network-wide propagation through document sharing, particularly in enterprise environments where Word documents are frequently exchanged. The attack surface includes any system running vulnerable Office versions, making it a significant concern for organizations with legacy software deployments. From an adversarial perspective, this vulnerability maps to ATT&CK technique T1203, which involves exploitation of software vulnerabilities for privilege escalation and code execution. The vulnerability's presence in multiple Office versions suggests a fundamental flaw in the string parsing implementation that was not properly addressed across different product lines. Organizations using these vulnerable applications face potential compromise through social engineering attacks where malicious documents are distributed via email or web downloads, with the attack succeeding once the document is opened by a user.
The technical nature of this vulnerability stems from improper handling of string data structures during document parsing operations, where the application fails to validate string boundaries and memory allocation parameters. When processing malformed strings, the Office application's memory management routines become corrupted, potentially allowing attackers to overwrite critical memory locations or execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user running the application. This type of vulnerability is classified as a buffer overflow or memory corruption issue, which represents one of the most serious categories of software flaws in terms of potential impact. The vulnerability's exploitation requires careful crafting of the malformed string data to trigger the specific memory corruption pattern, typically involving manipulation of string length fields, null termination sequences, or encoding structures. The fact that this vulnerability affects both Windows and Mac versions of the affected applications indicates a common underlying codebase issue that was not properly secured across platform implementations. Security researchers have identified that the vulnerability often manifests through stack-based buffer overflows or heap corruption scenarios, where attacker-controlled data is processed through vulnerable parsing functions. The exploitation process typically involves crafting a document with specific string structures that cause the Office application to allocate insufficient memory for string operations, leading to memory corruption that can be leveraged for code execution. This vulnerability type requires a high degree of precision in attack crafting and demonstrates the sophisticated nature of modern exploit development against enterprise applications.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should focus on immediate patch deployment and application of security updates from Microsoft, as the vendor would have released specific fixes addressing the memory corruption patterns. Organizations should implement document sanitization policies that scan incoming Word documents for malformed structures before allowing them to be processed by vulnerable applications. Network-based security controls such as email filtering and web proxy protections can help prevent delivery of malicious documents to end users. System hardening measures including application whitelisting, user privilege restrictions, and disabling automatic document opening features can reduce the attack surface. Security teams should also consider implementing endpoint detection and response solutions that can identify suspicious memory access patterns or code execution attempts. Regular vulnerability assessments should target legacy Office installations to identify systems running vulnerable versions that may not receive security updates. The remediation process must account for compatibility concerns with legacy systems while ensuring that the vulnerability is properly addressed. Organizations should also develop incident response procedures specifically addressing potential exploitation of this vulnerability, including forensic analysis capabilities for memory dumps and network traffic examination. Given the remote execution capabilities, network segmentation and monitoring controls become essential to detect and prevent exploitation attempts. The vulnerability's classification under multiple CWE categories underscores the need for comprehensive security controls that address various aspects of memory management and input validation. Training users to recognize suspicious document attachments and implementing secure document handling practices can further reduce the risk of successful exploitation.