CVE-2007-0101 in SPINE
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SPINE allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as administrators via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 08/13/2018
The CVE-2007-0101 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site request forgery flaw within the SPINE application framework that enables remote attackers to execute unauthorized administrative actions. This vulnerability operates at the application layer and specifically targets the authentication and authorization mechanisms that govern administrative operations within the system. The flaw stems from the application's inability to properly validate and verify the origin of requests, allowing malicious actors to craft forged requests that appear legitimate to the system's security controls. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-352, which specifically addresses Cross-Site Request Forgery, making it a well-documented and widely recognized category of web application security flaws. The attack vector leverages the trust relationship between the web application and its users, exploiting the fact that legitimate administrative sessions remain active while attackers can manipulate the application through crafted requests from external domains.
The technical implementation of this CSRF vulnerability within SPINE demonstrates a fundamental failure in request validation mechanisms that should normally ensure the authenticity of user intentions. When administrators perform administrative tasks, the application should verify that these requests originate from legitimate sources within the same domain and session context. However, the vulnerability allows attackers to bypass these protections by constructing malicious requests that exploit the browser's automatic handling of cookies and authentication tokens. The unspecified vectors mentioned in the description suggest that multiple attack paths exist within the application's administrative interface, potentially affecting various administrative functions such as user management, configuration changes, or system modifications. This weakness creates a significant risk because administrators typically possess elevated privileges and can perform actions that have far-reaching consequences for the entire system's security posture.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data manipulation to encompass complete system compromise when exploited by skilled attackers. An attacker who successfully exploits this CSRF vulnerability could potentially gain full administrative control over the SPINE system, allowing them to modify critical configurations, create or modify user accounts with elevated privileges, access sensitive data, or even disable security controls. The remote nature of the attack means that no local access or privileged information is required to exploit the vulnerability, making it particularly dangerous in environments where the application is accessible from untrusted networks. This vulnerability directly maps to several techniques documented in the ATT&CK framework under the T1566 category, which covers Phishing and Social Engineering attacks that can lead to privilege escalation. The impact is compounded by the fact that administrators often maintain long-lived sessions, increasing the window of opportunity for exploitation. Organizations may experience unauthorized data access, system misconfiguration, or complete service disruption if this vulnerability is successfully exploited.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2007-0101 should focus on implementing robust CSRF protection mechanisms within the SPINE application. The most effective approach involves implementing anti-CSRF tokens that are generated for each user session and validated with every administrative request. These tokens should be unique per request and tied to the user's session context, making it impossible for attackers to construct valid forged requests. Additionally, implementing proper origin validation checks and using the SameSite cookie attributes can significantly reduce the attack surface. Organizations should also consider implementing additional security controls such as request validation through referer headers, implementing proper session management practices, and ensuring that administrative functions require explicit user confirmation before execution. The remediation process should include thorough code reviews to identify all administrative endpoints that may be susceptible to CSRF attacks, and implementing consistent security controls across the entire application framework. Regular security testing and vulnerability assessments should be conducted to ensure that similar vulnerabilities are not present in other components of the system, as the presence of one CSRF vulnerability often indicates broader security gaps in the application's design.