CVE-2009-3578 in Autodesk Maya
Summary
by MITRE
Autodesk Maya 8.0, 8.5, 2008, 2009, and 2010 and Alias Wavefront Maya 6.5 and 7.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a (1) .ma or (2) .mb file that uses the Maya Embedded Language (MEL) python command or unspecified other MEL commands, related to "Script Nodes."
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/20/2025
This vulnerability exists in Autodesk Maya and Alias Wavefront Maya versions spanning multiple releases including 8.0, 8.5, 2008, 2009, 2010, 6.5, and 7.0. The flaw resides in the handling of script nodes within Maya's file format, specifically when processing .ma and .mb files that contain Maya Embedded Language commands. The vulnerability is categorized as a remote code execution flaw that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on systems running affected software versions. The issue stems from insufficient input validation and sanitization of MEL commands within script nodes, which are embedded within the Maya file format and automatically executed when the file is loaded. This represents a classic command injection vulnerability where user-controllable input is directly passed to the interpreter without proper sanitization, creating a pathway for malicious code execution.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability occurs through the Maya Embedded Language interpreter which processes script nodes embedded in .ma and .mb files. When these files are opened, the software automatically executes any MEL commands contained within script nodes, including python commands that can be used to execute arbitrary system commands. The vulnerability is particularly dangerous because it allows attackers to craft malicious Maya files that, when opened by an unsuspecting user, will execute code with the privileges of the user running the application. This type of vulnerability maps directly to CWE-94, which describes "Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')" and specifically relates to the execution of untrusted code through interpreted languages. The attack vector is particularly insidious as it leverages social engineering tactics where users might unknowingly open malicious files, making it a significant threat in enterprise environments where collaboration and file sharing are common practices.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple code execution to encompass complete system compromise and potential data exfiltration. Attackers could leverage this vulnerability to install backdoors, establish persistent access, or deploy additional malware payloads on compromised systems. The vulnerability affects not just individual workstations but also collaborative environments where multiple users might share files, potentially creating a chain reaction of compromise. In professional animation and modeling environments, where file sharing is routine, this vulnerability could be exploited to gain unauthorized access to intellectual property or to disrupt production workflows. The impact is particularly severe given that Maya is widely used in industries such as film, television, and video game development where the compromise of creative assets could result in significant financial and reputational damage. This vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1059.007 which covers "Command and Scripting Interpreter: Python" and represents a critical entry point for attackers seeking to establish persistent access within creative technology environments.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability require a multi-layered approach combining software updates, user education, and network security controls. The primary and most effective mitigation is to apply the vendor-provided security patches and updates that address the script node handling in Maya's file processing. Organizations should implement strict file validation policies and consider sandboxing or virtualization when opening unknown or untrusted Maya files. Network segmentation and access controls should limit the potential impact of successful exploitation attempts. Additionally, security awareness training should emphasize the dangers of opening files from untrusted sources, particularly in collaborative environments. Regular security assessments of creative software environments should be conducted to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities. The vulnerability also highlights the importance of implementing secure coding practices and input validation in interpreted language environments, which aligns with defensive techniques described in the MITRE ATT&CK framework for preventing code injection attacks.