CVE-2009-4265 in Ideal Administration 2009
Summary
by MITRE
Stack-based buffer overflow in Ideal Administration 2009 9.7.1, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long Computer value in an .ipj project file.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/04/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2009-4265 represents a critical stack-based buffer overflow flaw within Ideal Administration 2009 version 9.7.1 and potentially other iterations of the software. This vulnerability resides in the handling of project files with the .ipj extension, specifically when processing excessively long Computer values. The flaw manifests when the application fails to properly validate input length before copying data onto the stack, creating a condition where maliciously crafted input can overwrite adjacent memory locations. Such buffer overflow conditions typically occur when programmers do not implement adequate bounds checking mechanisms, allowing attackers to manipulate the program's execution flow by overwriting return addresses or other critical stack variables.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability requires remote attackers to craft a specially formatted .ipj project file containing an excessively long Computer value that exceeds the allocated stack buffer space. When the vulnerable application processes this malicious file, the buffer overflow enables attackers to overwrite the stack frame and potentially inject or redirect execution to arbitrary code. This type of vulnerability falls under CWE-121 Stack-based Buffer Overflow, which is classified as a fundamental memory safety issue that has been consistently identified as one of the most prevalent causes of application crashes and remote code execution exploits. The attack vector operates entirely through file-based manipulation, making it particularly dangerous as it can be delivered via email attachments, web downloads, or any medium capable of transferring the malicious .ipj file to the target system.
From an operational perspective, this vulnerability poses significant risk to organizations utilizing Ideal Administration 2009 software, as successful exploitation could result in complete system compromise. The remote code execution capability means attackers could gain unauthorized access to systems, escalate privileges, install persistent backdoors, or deploy additional malware. The impact extends beyond individual system compromise to potentially affect entire network infrastructures, especially in environments where this software is widely deployed for administrative purposes. The vulnerability's remote exploitability without requiring user interaction makes it particularly dangerous, as users may inadvertently open malicious project files from untrusted sources, and the attack can occur without any visible user prompts or warnings. Organizations using this software face potential data breaches, system downtime, and compliance violations, particularly in regulated environments where such vulnerabilities could constitute security policy violations.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2009-4265 should prioritize immediate remediation through vendor-provided patches or updates, as this vulnerability has been known since 2009 and likely has available fixes. Organizations should implement strict file validation policies, particularly for .ipj project files received from external sources, and consider deploying application whitelisting solutions to prevent execution of untrusted files. Network-based protections such as intrusion prevention systems can be configured to detect and block known malicious file patterns, while endpoint protection solutions should be updated to identify and prevent exploitation attempts. System administrators should also conduct thorough vulnerability assessments to identify all instances of the affected software across their infrastructure and implement network segmentation to limit potential lateral movement if exploitation occurs. The remediation process should include comprehensive testing of patches to ensure they do not introduce compatibility issues with existing administrative workflows. Additionally, organizations should consider implementing security awareness training to educate users about the dangers of opening untrusted project files and establish clear protocols for handling potentially malicious attachments. This vulnerability exemplifies the importance of maintaining up-to-date software and implementing defense-in-depth strategies that combine multiple security controls to protect against various attack vectors, including those that leverage known vulnerabilities in legacy software systems.