CVE-2010-0196 in Acrobat Reader
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.3.2, and 8.x before 8.2.2 on Windows and Mac OS X, allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0192 and CVE-2010-0193.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/16/2018
This vulnerability affects Adobe Reader and Acrobat software versions prior to specific patches, creating a significant security risk across Windows and Mac OS X platforms. The unspecified nature of the vulnerability vectors makes it particularly dangerous as attackers can exploit multiple potential entry points without clear indication of the exact weakness. The vulnerability exists in versions 9.x before 9.3.2 and 8.x before 8.2.2, indicating a widespread issue that impacted a substantial user base. Unlike similar vulnerabilities such as CVE-2010-0192 and CVE-2010-0193, this flaw represents a distinct threat vector that requires separate remediation efforts. The vulnerability's potential for both denial of service and arbitrary code execution places it in a critical risk category that demands immediate attention from security professionals.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability likely involves memory corruption issues or improper input validation within the Adobe software rendering engines. Given that the flaw affects PDF processing capabilities, it probably stems from how the applications handle malformed or specially crafted PDF files. The vulnerability may involve buffer overflows, heap corruption, or stack-based issues that occur during document parsing operations. Attackers could potentially craft malicious PDF documents that trigger the vulnerability when opened or processed by the affected software versions. This type of vulnerability typically falls under the category of memory safety issues that can be exploited through carefully constructed input data. The unspecified nature suggests that multiple attack vectors may exist within the processing pipeline of PDF documents.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple denial of service scenarios to potentially enable full system compromise. When exploited successfully, the vulnerability could allow remote code execution, giving attackers complete control over affected systems. This capability would enable unauthorized access to sensitive data, system manipulation, and potential lateral movement within network environments. Organizations relying on Adobe Reader and Acrobat for document processing face significant risk exposure, particularly in environments where users frequently open documents from untrusted sources. The vulnerability's presence in widely deployed software means that large numbers of systems could be simultaneously compromised, creating substantial operational disruption. Security teams would need to prioritize patching efforts across all affected systems while monitoring for exploitation attempts.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should include immediate deployment of Adobe's security patches, which would address the specific flaw in the affected software versions. Organizations should implement strict document filtering policies to prevent opening of suspicious PDF files, particularly those received from external sources. Network segmentation and access controls can help limit the potential impact if exploitation occurs. Security monitoring should focus on detecting unusual PDF processing activities or attempts to access vulnerable software versions. System hardening measures such as disabling unnecessary PDF features and implementing sandboxing techniques can reduce the attack surface. Regular vulnerability assessments should be conducted to identify and remediate similar issues in other software applications. This vulnerability demonstrates the importance of maintaining up-to-date software patches and implementing comprehensive security monitoring procedures. The ATT&CK framework would categorize this vulnerability under initial access and execution tactics, while CWE classifications would likely involve memory corruption weaknesses such as CWE-119 or CWE-121. Organizations should also consider implementing email filtering solutions and web application firewalls to prevent delivery of malicious PDF content to end users.