CVE-2010-1006 in Brainstorming
Summary
by MITRE
SQL injection vulnerability in the Brainstorming extension 0.1.8 and earlier for TYPO3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/02/2026
The CVE-2010-1006 vulnerability represents a critical sql injection flaw within the Brainstorming extension version 0.1.8 and earlier for the TYPO3 content management system. This vulnerability exposes the TYPO3 platform to remote code execution risks through improper input validation mechanisms within the extension's database interaction components. The flaw exists in the extension's handling of user-supplied data that flows directly into sql query construction without adequate sanitization or parameterization. Attackers can exploit this weakness by crafting malicious input that manipulates the sql query structure, potentially allowing full database access and arbitrary command execution on the underlying database server. The vulnerability affects the core database communication layer of the extension, making it a significant threat vector for unauthorized data access and system compromise.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from inadequate input validation and sanitization practices within the Brainstorming extension's codebase. The extension fails to properly escape or parameterize user inputs before incorporating them into sql queries, creating an environment where attacker-controlled data can modify the intended query execution path. This type of vulnerability maps directly to CWE-89 sql injection, which is classified as a high-severity weakness in the CWE taxonomy. The attack surface is broad as the vulnerability affects multiple database operations within the extension's functionality, potentially allowing attackers to extract sensitive information, modify database records, or even escalate privileges within the system. The unspecified vectors indicate that the vulnerability could be triggered through various user interaction points within the extension's interface, making it particularly dangerous as defenders cannot easily predict all possible attack paths.
The operational impact of CVE-2010-1006 extends beyond simple data theft, encompassing complete system compromise and potential lateral movement within network environments. Remote attackers with successful exploitation can gain access to sensitive user data, including authentication credentials, personal information, and confidential business data stored within the TYPO3 database. The vulnerability also enables attackers to modify or delete database content, potentially causing service disruption and data integrity issues. In environments where TYPO3 systems are integrated with other enterprise applications, this vulnerability could serve as a foothold for broader attacks. According to ATT&CK framework, this vulnerability maps to T1190 exploitation for client execution and T1071.004 application layer protocol, representing a significant threat to network security posture and business continuity. The vulnerability's impact is amplified when considering that TYPO3 installations often serve as content management platforms for critical business websites and applications.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2010-1006 require immediate action to address the root cause through proper input validation and parameterization. Organizations should upgrade to the Brainstorming extension version 0.1.9 or later, which contains the necessary patches to prevent sql injection attacks. System administrators must implement proper input sanitization techniques, including the use of prepared statements and parameterized queries to eliminate the risk of malicious sql injection. Network segmentation and database access controls should be reviewed to limit potential damage from successful exploitation attempts. Security monitoring should be enhanced to detect unusual database access patterns that may indicate exploitation attempts. Additionally, implementing web application firewalls and regular security assessments can provide additional layers of protection against similar vulnerabilities. The remediation process should include thorough testing of the patched extension to ensure that the fix does not introduce compatibility issues with existing system configurations while maintaining the security posture against sql injection attacks.