CVE-2010-3489 in CMS Digital Workroom
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in netautor/napro4/home/login2.php in CMS Digital Workroom (formerly Netautor Professional) 5.5.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the goback parameter.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/01/2025
The CVE-2010-3489 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site scripting flaw within the CMS Digital Workroom platform, formerly known as Netautor Professional version 5.5.0. This vulnerability exists in the login2.php script located within the netautor/napro4/home/ directory, making it a prime target for malicious actors seeking to exploit web application security weaknesses. The vulnerability specifically affects the goback parameter handling mechanism, which processes user input without proper sanitization or validation, creating an entry point for unauthorized code execution within victim browsers. The flaw demonstrates a classic improper input validation issue that has been documented under CWE-79, which categorizes it as a weakness allowing injection of malicious scripts into web applications. This vulnerability falls squarely within the ATT&CK framework under the technique T1566, specifically targeting the initial access phase through malicious web content delivery.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts or HTML content through manipulation of the goback parameter during the authentication process. When users navigate to the login page and are redirected back to a specific page after authentication, the goback parameter is processed without adequate sanitization measures. This creates a condition where an attacker can craft malicious URLs containing script tags or HTML elements that get executed in the context of other users' browsers. The vulnerability is particularly concerning because it occurs during the login process, a time when users are already authenticated or attempting to gain access to the system, making social engineering attacks more effective. The attack vector operates through HTTP requests that contain malicious payloads in the goback parameter, which are then rendered by the vulnerable application without proper encoding or validation.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple script injection, as it can enable attackers to perform various malicious activities including session hijacking, credential theft, data exfiltration, and redirection to malicious websites. An attacker could potentially steal user sessions, modify application behavior, or redirect users to phishing sites that appear legitimate within the context of the vulnerable CMS. The vulnerability affects the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the web application, as unauthorized parties can manipulate user sessions and compromise the trust relationship between users and the CMS. This particular flaw demonstrates how authentication mechanisms can be subverted through input manipulation, creating a persistent threat that can affect multiple users depending on the application's user base and access controls.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2010-3489 should focus on immediate input validation and output encoding measures to prevent script injection attacks. The primary solution involves implementing proper parameter sanitization for the goback parameter, ensuring that all user-supplied input is validated against a whitelist of acceptable values or properly encoded before being processed. Organizations should deploy web application firewalls that can detect and block malicious payloads targeting XSS vulnerabilities, while also implementing Content Security Policy headers to limit script execution capabilities. The remediation process requires updating the CMS Digital Workroom to version 5.5.1 or later, which includes patches addressing the input validation weakness. Security teams should also conduct comprehensive code reviews to identify similar patterns in other application components, as this vulnerability may indicate broader input handling issues that require systematic addressing. Additionally, regular security testing including automated vulnerability scanning and manual penetration testing should be implemented to prevent similar issues from emerging in future application versions, aligning with industry standards such as OWASP Top Ten and NIST cybersecurity frameworks.