CVE-2010-3510 in WebLogic
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 9.0, 9.1, 9.2.3, 10.0.2, 10.3.2, and 10.3.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Node Manager.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 03/13/2017
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2010-3510 represents a critical security flaw within Oracle WebLogic Server's Node Manager component, which forms part of the broader Oracle Fusion Middleware suite. This vulnerability affects multiple versions including 9.0, 9.1, 9.2.3, 10.0.2, 10.3.2, and 10.3.3, indicating a widespread issue that has persisted across several major releases. The Node Manager functionality serves as a critical administrative component responsible for managing WebLogic Server instances, making this vulnerability particularly concerning from a security perspective. The unspecified nature of the exact attack vectors suggests that the flaw may encompass multiple related weaknesses rather than a single specific vulnerability.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from weaknesses within the Node Manager's authentication and authorization mechanisms, which are fundamental to the security architecture of Oracle WebLogic Server. This component typically operates with elevated privileges and provides remote management capabilities, making it an attractive target for attackers seeking to compromise the underlying application server infrastructure. The vulnerability's impact spans all three core principles of information security confidentiality, integrity, and availability, indicating that successful exploitation could result in complete system compromise. From a cybersecurity perspective, this aligns with CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) and CWE-310 (Cryptographic Issues) categories, as the flaw likely involves inadequate access controls and potentially weak cryptographic implementations in the Node Manager's communication protocols.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends far beyond simple data theft or service disruption, as it represents a fundamental weakness in the administrative infrastructure that governs enterprise application servers. Organizations utilizing affected WebLogic Server versions face significant risks including unauthorized access to production environments, potential data breaches, system compromise, and complete service outages. The remote nature of the attack vectors means that adversaries can exploit this vulnerability from external networks without requiring physical access or prior authentication within the target environment. This characteristic places the vulnerability squarely within the ATT&CK framework's TA0001 (Initial Access) and TA0003 (Persistence) domains, as attackers could establish footholds and maintain long-term access to critical enterprise infrastructure. The widespread version support indicates that organizations across various industries and deployment scenarios would be affected, potentially creating cascading security issues throughout interconnected enterprise networks.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2010-3510 should prioritize immediate patching of affected systems with Oracle's security updates, as the vulnerability represents a known issue that has been addressed through official remediation procedures. Network segmentation and firewall rules should be implemented to restrict access to Node Manager ports and services, particularly in environments where external access is not strictly required. Organizations should also implement comprehensive monitoring of Node Manager activities and establish baseline behavioral patterns to detect anomalous access attempts. The vulnerability's classification as a remote attack vector necessitates strict network access controls and principle of least privilege enforcement for Node Manager configurations. Regular security assessments and penetration testing should be conducted to verify that the implemented mitigations are effective and that no additional attack surfaces remain unaddressed, ensuring that the organization's security posture remains resilient against similar vulnerabilities that may emerge in the future.