CVE-2013-0618 in Acrobat Reader
Summary
by MITRE
Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.5.3, 10.x before 10.1.5, and 11.x before 11.0.1 allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, related to a "logic error," a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0607, CVE-2013-0608, CVE-2013-0611, and CVE-2013-0614.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/27/2024
Adobe Reader and Acrobat versions 9.x before 9.5.3, 10.x before 10.1.5, and 11.x before 11.0.1 contain a critical logic error vulnerability that enables remote code execution attacks. This vulnerability represents a distinct security flaw from other related issues such as CVE-2013-0607, CVE-2013-0608, CVE-2013-0611, and CVE-2013-0614, indicating multiple attack vectors within the same software family. The unspecified vectors through which attackers can exploit this logic error typically involve malformed PDF files or crafted document elements that trigger unexpected behavior in the application's processing logic. This type of vulnerability falls under CWE-254, which encompasses security weaknesses related to improper error handling and logic flaws in software applications. The vulnerability is particularly dangerous because it allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems without requiring user interaction, making it a prime target for zero-day exploits in enterprise environments where Adobe Reader remains widely deployed.
The technical implementation of this logic error likely occurs within the document parsing and rendering components of Adobe Reader and Acrobat, where the application fails to properly validate or handle specific sequences of data structures within PDF files. Attackers can craft malicious PDF documents that exploit the flawed logic to bypass security checks, manipulate memory structures, or redirect execution flow within the application process. The vulnerability's classification as a logic error means that it stems from flawed programmatic decision-making rather than buffer overflows or injection flaws, which makes it more challenging to detect through traditional security scanning methods. This vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1203, which involves gaining access to systems through the exploitation of software vulnerabilities, and T1059, which covers the execution of malicious code through legitimate system processes. The attack surface is particularly wide given that Adobe Reader is installed on millions of systems worldwide, making this vulnerability a high-priority target for cybercriminals and nation-state actors seeking to establish persistent access to targeted networks.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond immediate code execution capabilities to include potential system compromise, data exfiltration, and lateral movement within compromised networks. Organizations that have not patched their Adobe Reader installations remain vulnerable to sophisticated attacks that could lead to full system compromise and persistent backdoor access. The vulnerability's presence in multiple version streams including 9.x, 10.x, and 11.x indicates that the logic error was present across several generations of the software, requiring comprehensive patch management across all affected versions. Security professionals should prioritize this vulnerability in their threat assessment models, particularly when analyzing incidents involving PDF-based attacks or suspicious document handling within enterprise environments. The vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of regular software updates and patch management programs, as it represents a security gap that existed for an extended period without detection. Organizations should implement network monitoring to detect potential exploitation attempts and ensure that all Adobe Reader installations are updated to the latest secure versions. The remediation process requires careful testing of patches to avoid disrupting legitimate business operations while ensuring that the vulnerability is fully addressed. This vulnerability also highlights the need for defense-in-depth strategies that include email filtering, web application firewalls, and user awareness training to reduce the attack surface for PDF-based exploitation attempts.