CVE-2013-0627 in Acrobat Reader
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.5.3, 10.x before 10.1.5, and 11.x before 11.0.1 allows local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/28/2024
Adobe Reader and Acrobat versions prior to the specified patches contain an unspecified privilege escalation vulnerability that affects multiple product lines including version 9.x before 9.5.3, 10.x before 10.1.5, and 11.x before 11.0.1. This vulnerability enables local attackers to escalate their privileges within the application environment, potentially allowing them to execute arbitrary code with elevated permissions. The unspecified nature of the vulnerability vectors suggests that the underlying flaw could manifest through multiple attack pathways within the software's privilege management mechanisms. The vulnerability resides in the core privilege handling components of Adobe's document processing software, which is widely deployed across enterprise and consumer environments, making it a significant security concern. According to CWE classification, this vulnerability would likely fall under CWE-269 Privilege Issues, specifically related to inadequate privilege management within the application's security model. The ATT&CK framework would categorize this under privilege escalation techniques, potentially leveraging process injection or memory manipulation methods to exploit the privilege boundary violations. The impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple local privilege escalation as it could enable attackers to bypass security controls that rely on proper privilege enforcement. The vulnerability's presence in multiple version streams indicates a fundamental flaw in the privilege management architecture that was not adequately addressed in the affected releases. Organizations running these vulnerable versions face heightened risk of unauthorized access and potential system compromise, particularly in environments where Adobe Reader is used for processing untrusted documents. The local nature of the vulnerability means that attackers must already have access to the target system to exploit it, but once successful, the privilege escalation could allow full system compromise. This vulnerability aligns with common attack patterns where software privilege boundaries are not properly enforced, creating opportunities for attackers to elevate their access level. The lack of specific vector details in the original CVE description suggests that the vulnerability may involve complex interactions between multiple system components, potentially including heap corruption or memory management issues that could be leveraged for privilege escalation. Security researchers have noted that such vulnerabilities often stem from inadequate input validation or improper privilege checking mechanisms within the application's core processing functions. The affected versions represent widely deployed software components that are frequently used for document viewing and processing, making the potential attack surface extensive. Organizations should prioritize patching these vulnerable versions to prevent exploitation attempts that could lead to complete system compromise.
The vulnerability represents a critical weakness in Adobe's privilege management system that could be exploited by local attackers to gain elevated system access. The unspecified nature of the attack vectors suggests that multiple pathways may exist for exploitation, potentially including memory corruption issues or improper privilege validation checks. This type of vulnerability is particularly concerning because it affects the fundamental security architecture of the software and could enable attackers to bypass standard security controls. The vulnerability's presence across multiple major versions indicates a systemic issue in the software's security design rather than an isolated incident. From a security perspective, this vulnerability violates the principle of least privilege by failing to properly enforce access controls within the application environment. The ATT&CK framework would classify this under privilege escalation tactics, with potential techniques involving process manipulation or memory corruption to exploit the underlying flaw. The vulnerability's impact is amplified by the widespread use of Adobe Reader and Acrobat across enterprise networks, where a successful exploitation could provide attackers with access to sensitive documents and systems. Organizations should implement immediate patch management procedures to address this vulnerability, as the window for exploitation remains open for systems running affected versions. The vulnerability's local nature suggests that it may require some form of initial access or user interaction, but once exploited, it could provide attackers with full system control. Security teams should monitor for potential exploitation attempts and ensure that all systems running vulnerable versions of Adobe Reader and Acrobat are updated to the latest secure releases.
Adobe Reader and Acrobat's privilege escalation vulnerability in versions prior to the specified patches represents a serious security flaw that could enable local attackers to gain elevated system privileges. The unspecified attack vectors indicate that the underlying issue may involve complex interactions within the application's security model, potentially affecting multiple subsystems including memory management and privilege enforcement mechanisms. This vulnerability type falls under CWE-269, which encompasses privilege-related security issues that can lead to unauthorized access and system compromise. The ATT&CK framework would categorize this as a privilege escalation technique, potentially utilizing methods such as process injection, memory manipulation, or exploitation of security boundaries within the application. The vulnerability's presence across multiple major versions suggests that the root cause is embedded in the core architecture rather than being a simple coding error. The impact extends beyond simple privilege escalation to potentially enable full system compromise when combined with other attack vectors. Organizations should prioritize immediate remediation efforts, as the vulnerability affects widely deployed software that is commonly used for processing sensitive documents. The vulnerability's local nature means that attackers must already have access to the target system, but successful exploitation could provide them with elevated privileges that could be leveraged for further attacks. Security professionals should implement comprehensive patch management procedures and monitor for potential exploitation attempts targeting these vulnerable versions. The widespread deployment of affected software versions makes this vulnerability particularly dangerous, as it could be exploited across numerous enterprise environments. Organizations should also consider implementing additional security controls such as application whitelisting and user access restrictions to limit the potential impact of successful exploitation attempts. The vulnerability demonstrates the importance of maintaining up-to-date software and proper security configuration management to prevent attackers from exploiting known weaknesses in commonly used applications.