CVE-2013-3754 in Solaris Cluster
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in the Solaris Cluster component in Oracle and Sun Systems Products Suite 3.3 allows local users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to HA for TimesTen.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/22/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2013-3754 resides within the Solaris Cluster component of Oracle and Sun Systems Products Suite version 3.3, specifically affecting the High Availability (HA) functionality for TimesTen database systems. This unspecified weakness represents a critical security gap that enables local attackers to compromise the fundamental security properties of the affected system. The vulnerability's classification as unspecified indicates that the exact technical mechanism remains undisclosed, which is common with certain classes of security flaws that may involve complex interactions between system components. The focus on HA for TimesTen suggests that this issue particularly impacts database clustering and high availability configurations where TimesTen is used as a high-performance in-memory database solution.
The technical flaw manifests within the Solaris Cluster implementation that governs the availability and reliability of TimesTen database services. Local users possessing system access can exploit this vulnerability to compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability simultaneously, representing a severe multi-impact security weakness. This triad compromise indicates that the vulnerability could enable attackers to access sensitive data, modify system information, and potentially disrupt service availability. The underlying mechanisms likely involve privilege escalation, resource manipulation, or access control bypass within the cluster management framework. The HA component's interaction with TimesTen creates a complex attack surface where the vulnerability could be leveraged to manipulate database cluster operations, potentially leading to data corruption or complete service disruption.
Operational impact of CVE-2013-3754 extends beyond simple data compromise to threaten the entire reliability infrastructure of systems using Solaris Cluster with TimesTen. Organizations maintaining database clusters for mission-critical applications face significant risk as local attackers could exploit this vulnerability to cause service outages, data breaches, or system corruption. The local nature of the attack vector suggests that compromise could occur through legitimate system access, making detection more challenging as the attack appears to originate from within the trusted network. This vulnerability particularly impacts enterprise environments where TimesTen is deployed for high-performance database operations, potentially affecting financial services, telecommunications, and other sectors requiring robust database availability and security. The unspecified nature of the vectors makes it difficult for organizations to fully assess their exposure or implement targeted defensive measures.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2013-3754 should focus on comprehensive system hardening and access control measures. Organizations must implement strict privilege management and ensure that only authorized personnel have local system access to affected systems. Regular security updates and patches from Oracle should be applied immediately upon availability, as this vulnerability likely represents a known flaw that has been addressed in subsequent releases. Network segmentation and monitoring solutions should be deployed to detect anomalous behavior that might indicate exploitation attempts. The vulnerability's impact on HA functionality suggests that organizations should also implement redundant monitoring and failover procedures to maintain service availability. Security teams should conduct thorough vulnerability assessments to identify all instances of Solaris Cluster with TimesTen installations and ensure proper access controls are in place. The weakness aligns with CWE categories related to privilege escalation and access control failures, while potentially mapping to ATT&CK techniques involving local privilege escalation and service disruption. Organizations should also consider implementing principle of least privilege models and regular security audits to prevent unauthorized local access that could lead to exploitation of this vulnerability.