CVE-2014-1965 in NetWeaver
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ISpeakAdapter in the Integration Repository in the SAP Exchange Infrastructure (BC-XI) component 3.0, 7.00 through 7.02, and 7.10 through 7.11 for SAP NetWeaver allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to PIP.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/22/2017
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2014-1965 represents a critical cross-site scripting flaw within SAP NetWeaver's Integration Repository component, specifically affecting the ISpeakAdapter module. This vulnerability exists in the SAP Exchange Infrastructure (BC-XI) component across multiple versions including 3.0, 7.00 through 7.02, and 7.10 through 7.11. The flaw stems from insufficient input validation and sanitization mechanisms when processing PIP (Process Integration Protocol) data, creating a pathway for malicious actors to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML code within the context of affected systems. The vulnerability's classification as a CWE-79 (Cross-site Scripting) attack vector aligns with the broader category of injection flaws that compromise web application security.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability occurs through the manipulation of PIP data processing within the Integration Repository, where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being rendered in web interfaces. Attackers can craft malicious payloads that, when processed by the ISpeakAdapter, get executed in the browsers of unsuspecting users who access the affected SAP NetWeaver systems. This creates a persistent threat where malicious scripts can steal session cookies, perform unauthorized actions on behalf of users, or redirect victims to malicious sites. The vulnerability's impact extends beyond simple data theft as it can enable full browser compromise and facilitate more sophisticated attacks such as credential harvesting or privilege escalation within the SAP environment. The ATT&CK framework categorizes this as a web application attack vector under the technique of "Cross-Site Scripting" (T1059.008) with potential for lateral movement through session hijacking.
The operational implications of CVE-2014-1965 are severe for organizations relying on SAP NetWeaver integration infrastructure, as it can lead to complete compromise of the integration repository and potentially broader system access. The vulnerability affects critical business processes that depend on integration flows, making it particularly dangerous for enterprises where integration repositories manage mission-critical data exchanges. Organizations may experience unauthorized data access, modification of integration processes, or complete disruption of business operations through the execution of malicious scripts. The attack surface is particularly concerning given that SAP Exchange Infrastructure components are often exposed to external networks and frequently process data from multiple sources, increasing the likelihood of successful exploitation. Security teams must consider this vulnerability in their risk assessments as it represents a significant weakness in SAP's web application security posture and could serve as a stepping stone for more comprehensive attacks against enterprise SAP infrastructures.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2014-1965 should prioritize immediate patch application from SAP, as the vendor has released security notes and patches addressing this specific vulnerability. Organizations should implement robust input validation and output encoding mechanisms to prevent script injection, particularly focusing on PIP data handling within the Integration Repository. Network segmentation and access controls should be strengthened to limit exposure of vulnerable components, while regular security assessments of SAP environments should include comprehensive testing for similar injection vulnerabilities. The implementation of web application firewalls and content security policies can provide additional layers of protection, though these measures should complement rather than replace proper patch management and input sanitization. Security monitoring should include detection of suspicious PIP data patterns and anomalous user behavior that might indicate exploitation attempts, with incident response procedures established to handle potential breaches involving this vulnerability.