CVE-2014-3518 in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Summary
by MITRE
jmx-remoting.sar in JBoss Remoting, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JEAP) 5.2.0, Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5.3.1, Red Hat JBoss Portal Platform 5.2.2, and Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 5.3.1, does not properly implement the JSR 160 specification, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/16/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2014-3518 affects the jmx-remoting.sar component within JBoss Remoting, a critical middleware element in Red Hat JBoss enterprise platforms. This flaw exists in multiple JBoss products including the Enterprise Application Platform 5.2.0, Business Rules Management System 5.3.1, Portal Platform 5.2.2, and SOA Platform 5.3.1 versions. The vulnerability stems from improper implementation of the JSR 160 specification, which governs Java Management Extensions remote management capabilities. JSR 160 defines the standard for remote management of Java applications through JMX, establishing protocols for connecting to managed beans and executing operations remotely. The failure to correctly implement these standards creates a security gap that can be exploited by malicious actors to gain unauthorized access to the underlying system.
The technical flaw manifests in how the JBoss Remoting component handles remote JMX connections, specifically in the jmx-remoting.sar module that manages the JSR 160 compliant remote management interface. Attackers can leverage this weakness through unspecified vectors that likely involve crafting malicious JMX requests or exploiting authentication bypass mechanisms within the remoting layer. The vulnerability allows for arbitrary code execution, meaning that an attacker who successfully exploits this flaw can run any command on the target system with the privileges of the JBoss process. This represents a severe privilege escalation vulnerability that can potentially lead to complete system compromise. The issue falls under CWE-284, which addresses improper access control in software implementations, and aligns with ATT&CK technique T1059 for command and scripting interpreter, as successful exploitation would enable attackers to execute arbitrary commands.
The operational impact of CVE-2014-3518 is substantial for organizations running affected JBoss platforms, as it provides a direct path for remote code execution without requiring authentication. Systems utilizing these vulnerable components become susceptible to attacks that could result in data breaches, system compromise, or service disruption. The vulnerability affects enterprise environments where JBoss is used for business-critical applications, making it particularly dangerous for financial services, healthcare providers, or any organization handling sensitive data. Organizations may face regulatory compliance issues and potential legal consequences if exploited successfully. The attack surface is broad since JMX remoting is commonly enabled in production environments for monitoring and management purposes, and the vulnerability can be exploited from external networks if proper firewall rules are not implemented.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2014-3518 should include immediate patching of affected JBoss platforms to the versions that contain the fixed implementation of JSR 160 compliance. Organizations should disable JMX remoting if it is not required for operational purposes, or implement strict network segmentation to limit access to the JMX ports. Firewall rules should be configured to restrict access to JMX endpoints to trusted IP addresses only, and strong authentication mechanisms should be enforced. Additionally, monitoring for suspicious JMX connection attempts and implementing intrusion detection systems can help identify potential exploitation attempts. Security teams should conduct comprehensive vulnerability assessments to identify all instances of affected JBoss installations within their environment and prioritize remediation based on risk assessment. Regular security updates and patch management processes should be strengthened to prevent similar issues in future deployments, particularly focusing on ensuring proper implementation of industry standards like JSR 160 in enterprise middleware components.