CVE-2014-5909 in watcha
Summary
by MITRE
The watcha (aka com.frograms.watcha) application 2.0.2 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/06/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2014-5909 affects the watcha application version 2.0.2 for Android devices, representing a critical security flaw in the application's implementation of secure communication protocols. This issue stems from the application's failure to properly validate X.509 certificates during SSL/TLS connections, creating a significant attack surface that adversaries can exploit to compromise user data integrity and confidentiality. The vulnerability specifically targets the certificate verification mechanism that should ensure secure communication between the mobile application and remote servers, fundamentally undermining the security model designed to protect sensitive information exchanges.
The technical flaw manifests as a complete absence of certificate validation within the application's SSL implementation, allowing attackers to perform man-in-the-middle attacks by presenting fraudulent certificates that appear legitimate to the vulnerable application. This weakness directly violates established security protocols and standards, as the application fails to implement proper certificate chain validation, hostname verification, or trust anchor validation that are essential components of secure SSL/TLS communication. The vulnerability can be categorized under CWE-295 which specifically addresses "Improper Certificate Validation" and aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566.001 for "Phishing via Service Provider" and T1046 for "Network Service Scanning" when attackers exploit this weakness to intercept communications.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data interception, as it enables attackers to not only eavesdrop on communications but also to actively modify data in transit, inject malicious content, or redirect users to fraudulent services without detection. Users of the watcha application become vulnerable to various attack scenarios including credential theft, session hijacking, and exposure of personal information, as the application cannot distinguish between legitimate servers and malicious imposters. The vulnerability affects all users who interact with the application's network services, particularly those accessing sensitive features or personal data, creating a persistent threat that remains active as long as the vulnerable version remains in use. The lack of certificate verification essentially removes the cryptographic assurance that users expect when communicating with secure services, making the application particularly dangerous for any functionality involving user authentication or personal data handling.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability require immediate implementation of proper certificate validation mechanisms within the application's SSL/TLS stack, including enforcement of certificate chain validation, hostname matching, and trust anchor verification. Organizations should implement certificate pinning where appropriate, ensuring that the application only accepts certificates from trusted Certificate Authorities and specific server identities. The fix should involve updating the application's network security configuration to properly validate SSL certificates against established trust stores and implement proper error handling for certificate validation failures. Additionally, developers should conduct comprehensive security testing including penetration testing and vulnerability assessments to ensure that all network communication paths properly validate certificates and implement robust security controls. The remediation process should also include regular security updates and patch management procedures to prevent similar vulnerabilities from being introduced in future versions, aligning with industry best practices for mobile application security and compliance with standards such as NIST SP 800-53 and ISO/IEC 27001 requirements for secure application development and maintenance.