CVE-2014-7416 in Craft Stamper Magazine
Summary
by MITRE
The Craft Stamper Magazine (aka com.triactivemedia.craftstamper) application @7F080183 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/05/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2014-7416 affects the Craft Stamper Magazine Android application, specifically manifesting in the application's handling of SSL/TLS certificate verification during network communications. This flaw represents a critical security weakness that fundamentally undermines the application's ability to establish secure connections with remote servers. The application fails to properly validate X.509 certificates presented by SSL servers, creating an exploitable gap in the security architecture that malicious actors can leverage to compromise user data and system integrity.
This technical flaw directly relates to the absence of proper certificate pinning and validation mechanisms within the application's network security implementation. The vulnerability enables man-in-the-middle attacks by allowing attackers to present fraudulent certificates that the application accepts without proper verification. The certificate validation process typically involves checking certificate authorities, expiration dates, and certificate chains, but in this case, these security checks are bypassed entirely. This weakness is classified under CWE-295, which specifically addresses improper certificate validation, and represents a fundamental failure in the application's secure communication protocols.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data interception, as it allows attackers to establish fraudulent communication channels with the application's backend services. An attacker positioned between the user's device and the server can present a malicious certificate that appears legitimate to the application, enabling them to decrypt and manipulate sensitive information transmitted between the user and the server. This includes personal data, account credentials, and any other information exchanged through the application's network connections, potentially leading to identity theft, financial fraud, and unauthorized access to user accounts.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability require immediate implementation of proper SSL certificate validation mechanisms within the application. The recommended approach involves implementing certificate pinning techniques that validate server certificates against a known set of trusted certificates or public keys, rather than relying solely on the standard certificate chain validation. Security best practices dictate that applications should implement certificate validation using established cryptographic libraries that properly enforce certificate chain validation, including checking certificate authorities, expiration dates, and certificate signatures. Additionally, the application should be updated to utilize secure communication protocols that enforce proper certificate validation as outlined in industry standards such as those specified in the OWASP Mobile Security Project recommendations and NIST guidelines for mobile application security.
This vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of proper secure communication implementation in mobile applications, particularly those handling sensitive user data. The lack of certificate verification represents a fundamental security oversight that can be exploited by attackers with minimal technical expertise to gain unauthorized access to user information. The security implications extend to potential data breaches, privacy violations, and compliance issues with regulatory frameworks such as gdpr and hipaa that mandate proper data protection measures. Organizations developing mobile applications must ensure that all network communications implement robust certificate validation mechanisms to prevent similar vulnerabilities from being introduced into their products.