CVE-2015-3292 in OnCommand Workflow Automation
Summary
by MITRE
The installer in NetApp OnCommand Workflow Automation before 2.2.1P1 and 3.x before 3.0P1 sets up the Java Debugging Wire Protocol (JDWP) service, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/26/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2015-3292 represents a critical security flaw in NetApp OnCommand Workflow Automation software versions prior to specific patch releases. This issue resides within the installer component of the application, which improperly configures the Java Debugging Wire Protocol service during the installation process. The JDWP service is designed for debugging Java applications and typically operates on a specific network port, but in this case it is exposed without proper security controls, creating a significant attack surface for malicious actors.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from the installer's failure to properly secure the JDWP service configuration. When the installer sets up this debugging protocol, it enables remote connectivity to the Java Virtual Machine without requiring authentication or proper access controls. This misconfiguration allows attackers to connect to the JDWP service and execute arbitrary code on the target system, effectively providing them with the same privileges as the application itself. The unspecified vectors mentioned in the description indicate that multiple attack pathways may exist, potentially including network-based exploitation and privilege escalation scenarios.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple remote code execution, as it fundamentally compromises the security posture of systems running affected NetApp OnCommand Workflow Automation versions. Organizations utilizing this software face significant risks including complete system compromise, data exfiltration, and potential lateral movement within their network infrastructure. The vulnerability affects both the 2.2.1P1 and 3.0P1 release lines, indicating it was present across multiple major versions and likely went undetected for extended periods. This type of vulnerability aligns with CWE-284, which addresses improper access control in software systems, and represents a classic case of insecure default configuration that provides attackers with elevated privileges.
From a threat modeling perspective, this vulnerability maps directly to several ATT&CK techniques including T1059 for command and script interpreter usage, T1046 for network service scanning, and T1068 for exploit for privilege escalation. The attack surface created by the exposed JDWP service allows adversaries to leverage this weakness as a foothold for more extensive compromise operations. Organizations should consider implementing network segmentation to isolate systems running vulnerable software and monitor for unusual JDWP service activity on standard debugging ports. The remediation approach requires immediate patching to the affected versions, as well as verification that the JDWP service is properly disabled or secured in the application configuration. This vulnerability highlights the importance of secure configuration management and the potential risks associated with leaving debugging services enabled in production environments.