CVE-2015-4782 in Berkeley DB
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in the Data Store component in Oracle Berkeley DB 11.2.5.1.29, 11.2.5.2.42, 11.2.5.3.28, and 12.1.6.0.35 allows local users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-2583, CVE-2015-2624, CVE-2015-2626, CVE-2015-2640, CVE-2015-2654, CVE-2015-2656, CVE-2015-4754, CVE-2015-4764, CVE-2015-4775, CVE-2015-4776, CVE-2015-4777, CVE-2015-4778, CVE-2015-4780, CVE-2015-4781, CVE-2015-4783, CVE-2015-4784, CVE-2015-4785, CVE-2015-4786, CVE-2015-4787, CVE-2015-4789, and CVE-2015-4790.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/27/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2015-4782 resides within Oracle Berkeley DB's Data Store component, affecting multiple version releases including 11.2.5.1.29, 11.2.5.2.42, 11.2.5.3.28, and 12.1.6.0.35. This unspecified flaw represents a significant security concern within the database management system that has been widely deployed across enterprise environments. The Data Store component serves as a critical foundation for data persistence and retrieval operations, making any vulnerability in this area particularly dangerous for organizations relying on Berkeley DB for their data storage needs. The vulnerability's classification as affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability indicates a comprehensive impact that could potentially allow attackers to manipulate, steal, or disrupt database operations.
The technical nature of this vulnerability remains unspecified in the public description, which is common for certain types of security flaws that may involve complex interactions between multiple system components or subtle implementation errors. However, given that this affects the Data Store component of a database system, the underlying issue likely involves memory management, access control mechanisms, or data processing routines that could be exploited through local user access. The vulnerability's distinction from numerous other CVE identifiers suggests it operates through different attack vectors or exploits different system weaknesses compared to the related vulnerabilities mentioned in the description. This separation from other known vulnerabilities indicates a unique exploitation pathway that requires specific analysis and remediation approaches.
From an operational standpoint, the impact of CVE-2015-4782 extends across all three fundamental security principles of information security. Confidentiality breaches could allow unauthorized access to sensitive data stored within the Berkeley DB instances, potentially exposing proprietary information, personal data, or business-critical records. Integrity compromises might enable attackers to modify database contents without detection, leading to data corruption or manipulation that could affect business operations and decision-making processes. Availability impacts could manifest through denial-of-service conditions that prevent legitimate users from accessing database services, potentially causing operational disruptions and financial losses. The local user access requirement suggests that attackers would need to already have system-level privileges or physical access to the affected systems, but this still represents a significant escalation risk for organizations.
Organizations affected by this vulnerability should prioritize immediate assessment of their Berkeley DB deployments to identify systems running the vulnerable versions mentioned in the CVE description. The mitigation strategy should include applying the latest Oracle patches and updates specifically designed to address this vulnerability, following the vendor's recommended remediation procedures. System administrators should also consider implementing additional security controls such as access restrictions, monitoring solutions, and network segmentation to limit potential exploitation opportunities. The vulnerability's classification as affecting multiple versions suggests that organizations may need to upgrade across several release branches to achieve complete protection. Security teams should also conduct thorough vulnerability assessments to identify any potential exploitation attempts and establish incident response procedures to address potential security breaches.
This vulnerability aligns with CWE categories related to unspecified security flaws in database systems and could potentially map to ATT&CK techniques involving privilege escalation, data manipulation, and service disruption. The specific attack surface and exploitation methods would need further analysis through detailed penetration testing and security assessments to fully understand the threat landscape. Organizations should also consider implementing comprehensive monitoring solutions to detect any anomalous database access patterns that might indicate exploitation attempts, as the unspecified nature of the vulnerability makes traditional signature-based detection approaches potentially ineffective. The vulnerability's presence in multiple release versions emphasizes the importance of maintaining up-to-date software inventory and patch management processes to prevent similar issues from affecting other components of the database infrastructure.