CVE-2016-8614 in Ansibleinfo

Summary

by MITRE

A flaw was found in Ansible before version 2.2.0. The apt_key module does not properly verify key fingerprints, allowing remote adversary to create an OpenPGP key which matches the short key ID and inject this key instead of the correct key.

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 04/27/2023

The vulnerability identified as CVE-2016-8614 resides within the Ansible automation platform, specifically affecting versions prior to 2.2.0. This flaw exists in the apt_key module which is responsible for managing GPG keys used in package verification processes on debian-based systems. The issue stems from insufficient cryptographic verification mechanisms that allow attackers to exploit weak key validation procedures. The vulnerability represents a critical security weakness in the software supply chain management capabilities of Ansible, potentially compromising the integrity of package installations across managed systems.

The technical implementation flaw occurs when the apt_key module processes OpenPGP key imports without properly validating the full key fingerprint. Instead of requiring verification of the complete cryptographic hash, the module accepts keys based solely on short key ID matching, which creates a potential collision scenario. Attackers can generate a malicious OpenPGP key that shares the same short key ID as a legitimate key, thereby bypassing the verification process. This weakness directly violates proper cryptographic practices and undermines the trust model that package management systems rely upon for security. The vulnerability maps to CWE-327, which specifically addresses the use of weak cryptographic algorithms and improper implementation of cryptographic functions.

The operational impact of this vulnerability extends across enterprise environments that utilize Ansible for system management and configuration deployment. When exploited, the flaw allows remote adversaries to inject malicious GPG keys that can subsequently be used to sign and distribute compromised packages. This creates a persistent backdoor mechanism that can compromise multiple systems simultaneously, as the injected keys would be trusted by the package management systems. The attack vector represents a supply chain compromise that can persist across system updates and reboots, making detection and remediation particularly challenging. This vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1556.002, which covers credential harvesting through the manipulation of authentication systems.

Mitigation strategies for CVE-2016-8614 require immediate version upgrading of Ansible to 2.2.0 or later, which includes improved key verification mechanisms. Organizations should implement comprehensive key management policies that enforce full fingerprint verification rather than relying on short key IDs. Security teams must conduct thorough audits of existing GPG key repositories to identify and remove any potentially compromised keys. Additionally, implementing automated monitoring systems that detect unauthorized key modifications and establishing multi-factor verification processes for key management operations will significantly reduce the attack surface. The remediation process should also include regular security assessments of automation tools to ensure they maintain adequate cryptographic standards and prevent similar vulnerabilities from emerging in other components of the infrastructure.

Responsible

Red Hat, Inc.

Reservation

10/12/2016

Disclosure

07/31/2018

Moderation

accepted

CPE

ready

EPSS

0.00102

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!