CVE-2017-14985 in EyesOfNetwork Web Interface
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the EyesOfNetwork web interface (aka eonweb) 5.1-0 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the url parameter to module/module_frame/index.php.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/21/2019
The CVE-2017-14985 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site scripting flaw discovered in the EyesOfNetwork web interface version 5.1-0, specifically within the module/module_frame/index.php endpoint. This vulnerability affects remote authenticated users who can exploit the weakness by injecting malicious web script or HTML code through the url parameter, creating a significant security risk for organizations relying on this network monitoring platform. The EyesOfNetwork system, designed for network security monitoring and management, becomes compromised when attackers leverage this XSS vulnerability to execute malicious code in the context of authenticated users' browsers.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation and output encoding within the module_frame/index.php script. When the application processes the url parameter without proper sanitization, it fails to escape or encode special characters that could be interpreted as HTML or JavaScript code. This allows attackers to inject malicious payloads that execute in the victim's browser when the compromised page is rendered. The vulnerability specifically resides in the web interface's handling of user-supplied input, making it a classic example of improper neutralization of input during web application development. This flaw aligns with CWE-79 which defines the weakness as the failure to neutralize input data in a manner that prevents it from being interpreted as executable code by the web browser.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple script injection, as authenticated users with access to the EyesOfNetwork interface can potentially escalate their privileges or compromise the entire system. Attackers can leverage this vulnerability to steal session cookies, perform unauthorized actions on behalf of legitimate users, or redirect victims to malicious websites. The risk is particularly concerning for network administrators who use the EyesOfNetwork platform for critical security monitoring tasks, as successful exploitation could provide attackers with access to sensitive network information and monitoring data. This vulnerability essentially undermines the security posture of organizations relying on EyesOfNetwork for network security management, as it allows for persistent threats that can evade traditional security controls.
Organizations should implement immediate mitigations including input validation and output encoding controls to prevent unauthorized script injection. The recommended approach involves implementing strict parameter validation for the url parameter in module_frame/index.php, ensuring all user-supplied input is properly sanitized before processing. Additionally, developers should implement proper HTML encoding for all dynamic content rendered in the web interface to prevent malicious scripts from executing. Security measures should include input filtering that removes or encodes potentially dangerous characters such as angle brackets, quotes, and script tags. The implementation of Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can provide an additional layer of protection against XSS attacks by restricting the sources from which scripts can be loaded. Organizations should also consider implementing Web Application Firewalls (WAF) rules specifically designed to detect and block XSS attempts targeting this vulnerability. This vulnerability demonstrates the importance of following secure coding practices and adhering to OWASP Top Ten security guidelines, particularly those addressing input validation and output encoding. The attack surface for this vulnerability can be reduced by implementing least privilege access controls and regular security assessments to identify similar weaknesses in the application's codebase.