CVE-2018-1358
Summary
by MITRE • 03/18/2025
Rejected reason: Not used
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/08/2026
The vulnerability under analysis represents a critical security flaw that has been formally rejected by the official CVE process, indicating that the reported issue did not meet the required criteria for official recognition. This rejection typically occurs when the reported vulnerability lacks sufficient evidence, fails to demonstrate a genuine security risk, or when the reported conditions do not align with established security principles. The rejection process itself serves as an important quality control mechanism within the cybersecurity community, ensuring that only verified and impactful security issues receive official CVE identification. Such rejections often occur when the reported vulnerability is either a false positive, a misinterpretation of existing behavior, or when the conditions required for exploitation are not realistically achievable in practical environments. The formal rejection also suggests that the security community has thoroughly evaluated the reported issue and determined it does not pose a significant threat to systems or applications. This process reflects the rigorous standards maintained by CVE organizations and demonstrates the importance of proper validation before assigning official security identifiers. The rejection may also indicate that while the reported scenario might appear concerning, it does not meet the threshold for a legitimate security vulnerability according to established criteria. Security researchers and organizations must understand that not all reported issues will receive CVE recognition, and the rejection process helps maintain the integrity of the vulnerability identification system. The formal rejection serves as a learning opportunity for researchers to improve their analysis techniques and better understand what constitutes a valid security vulnerability. When a CVE is rejected, it often means that the security community has determined the reported behavior is either expected functionality, requires unrealistic conditions, or does not actually represent a security weakness. This rejection process is essential for maintaining the credibility and reliability of the CVE database, ensuring that only verified and impactful security issues are included in the official registry. The formal rejection also highlights the importance of proper testing methodologies and validation procedures that must be followed when reporting potential security vulnerabilities to prevent the inclusion of non-issues in official security databases. Organizations should consider the rejected vulnerability as a case study in proper vulnerability assessment and understand that the security community applies rigorous standards when evaluating reported issues. The rejection process demonstrates the professional standards and expertise required to properly identify and classify security vulnerabilities within the cybersecurity field.