CVE-2019-4530 in Maximo Asset Management
Summary
by MITRE
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6, 7.6.1, and 7.6.1.1 could allow an authenticated user to delete a record that they should not normally be able to. IBM X-Force ID: 165586.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/26/2024
IBM Maximo Asset Management version 7.6, 7.6.1, and 7.6.1.1 contains a security vulnerability that allows authenticated users to perform unauthorized record deletion operations. This flaw represents a critical access control weakness that violates fundamental security principles of data integrity and authorization. The vulnerability specifically affects the application's permission model where users with certain privileges can manipulate database records beyond their designated access levels. The issue stems from insufficient validation of user permissions during delete operations, allowing malicious or compromised authenticated users to bypass normal access controls and remove records they should not have the authority to delete. This type of vulnerability falls under CWE-285, which addresses improper authorization in software systems, and aligns with ATT&CK technique T1485, which covers data destruction through unauthorized deletion of records. The impact extends beyond simple data loss as it can compromise the integrity of asset management workflows, potentially affecting maintenance schedules, inventory tracking, and operational continuity. Organizations using these Maximo versions face significant risk of unauthorized data manipulation that could disrupt business operations and create audit trail gaps.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability occurs within the application's data access layer where delete commands are executed without proper authorization checks against the user's role-based permissions. Attackers can exploit this weakness by crafting specific requests that bypass normal validation mechanisms, essentially allowing them to perform administrative-level deletions with standard user credentials. This represents a classic privilege escalation scenario where normal user accounts gain elevated capabilities through flawed authorization logic. The vulnerability is particularly concerning because it affects the core asset management functionality, meaning that unauthorized deletions could remove critical maintenance records, asset configurations, or operational data that other users depend on for business processes. The flaw exists in the application's business logic rather than in underlying database security, making it more difficult to detect through traditional database-level controls. The IBM X-Force ID 165586 indicates this vulnerability was recognized and tracked by IBM's security team, suggesting it was identified through standard vulnerability assessment processes.
Organizations operating affected IBM Maximo versions must urgently implement mitigations to protect their asset management systems from unauthorized record deletion. The most effective immediate solution involves applying the official IBM security patches and updates released for this vulnerability, which typically include enhanced permission validation mechanisms and stricter authorization checks during delete operations. System administrators should also review and tighten user role configurations to ensure that deletion privileges are properly restricted to authorized personnel only. Additional defensive measures include implementing comprehensive audit logging for all deletion activities, establishing monitoring rules for unusual deletion patterns, and conducting regular security assessments of the Maximo environment. Organizations should also consider implementing network segmentation to limit access to the Maximo application and employ multi-factor authentication for administrative accounts. The vulnerability's impact on data integrity makes it essential to maintain regular backups and establish clear recovery procedures that can restore deleted records when unauthorized deletions occur. Security teams should also review their incident response procedures to ensure they can quickly identify and respond to unauthorized deletion attempts that may indicate compromise of user accounts or exploitation of this vulnerability.
This vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of proper access control implementation in enterprise asset management systems. The flaw essentially creates a backdoor for authenticated users to perform actions that should be restricted to administrators or privileged roles, representing a fundamental breakdown in the application's security architecture. From an ATT&CK perspective, this vulnerability enables adversaries to achieve data destruction objectives while maintaining low detection risk since the actions occur through legitimate authenticated sessions. The issue also highlights the need for comprehensive security testing of business logic flows, as the problem manifests in application-level operations rather than network or system-level vulnerabilities. Organizations should treat this as a wake-up call to review all authorization mechanisms within their enterprise applications and ensure that proper principle of least privilege controls are implemented across all system components. The vulnerability's presence in widely-used enterprise software underscores the importance of maintaining current security patches and implementing robust security monitoring to detect anomalous behavior that might indicate exploitation attempts.