CVE-2020-29113
Summary
by MITRE • 11/05/2026
Rejected reason: Reserved ID never published and not linked to any VULN ticket - quota reclaim 2026-11-05
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/05/2026
The provided input string indicates a administrative status update regarding a Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures identifier rather than describing an actual security flaw. The phrase reserved id never published signifies that the assigned CVE number was held in reserve by a Certified Numbering Authority but was ultimately not associated with any publicly disclosed vulnerability report or linked to a corresponding VULN ticket within the tracking system. This administrative action results in quota reclaim, meaning the identifier is being returned to the pool of available numbers for future allocation rather than remaining permanently assigned to an unreported issue.
From a technical perspective, this status reflects a gap in the vulnerability disclosure lifecycle where a potential security issue was either investigated and found to be non-existent, misclassified as something other than a CVE-eligible flaw, or abandoned by the reporter before publication. In such cases, no specific Common Weakness Enumeration category applies because there is no underlying software defect, configuration error, or design flaw documented in any public database. Consequently, there are no associated ATT&CK techniques to map since no exploit code, attack vector, or malicious behavior has been recorded for this identifier.
The operational impact of such a reserved and reclaimed ID is negligible on the security posture of affected systems because it does not correspond to any actionable threat intelligence. Security information and event management platforms, vulnerability scanners, and patch management tools will ignore these identifiers as they lack associated metadata, severity scores, or remediation guidance. Organizations do not need to implement specific mitigations for this entry since no vulnerable software version is defined by the reservation record itself.
Proper governance of CVE assignments requires rigorous validation before publication to ensure that every reserved identifier corresponds to a verifiable security weakness affecting widely deployed technology. When discrepancies arise during the review process, such as missing linkage to a VULN ticket or failure to meet disclosure criteria, reclaiming the ID prevents the proliferation of orphaned entries in global vulnerability databases. This practice maintains data integrity and ensures that analysts focus only on validated threats with clear technical descriptions and remediation paths rather than investigating phantom vulnerabilities that have no real-world manifestation.